Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Humphreys v. Marquette Casualty Co., 103 So. 2d 895.

59 citing documents.

Latashia v. Perez, Both Individually and on Behalf of Unborn Child of Travis Chiokai (Deceased) v. Irby Construction … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
However, the intermediate court correctly noted that the Humphreys decision is * (1958), the supreme court stated, “We feel that we can add little to [the appellate court’s] opinion, except to say that it was never within the contemplation of the legislature to include under the provisions of LSA-R.S.
Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corporation v. Industrial Helicopters, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
They argue that, under Humphreys [v. Marquette, So.2d 895 (1958),] and Perry [v. Perry & Sons Vault & Grave Serv., 03-1519 (La.App 3 Cir. 5/12/04), writs denied, 04-1610, 04-1504, 04-1616 (La.
La. Workers' Comp. Corp. v. Indus. Helicopters, LLC 248 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
They argue that, under Humphreys [ v. Marquette , , (1958),] and Perry [ v. Perry & Sons Vault & Grave Serv.
Tommie Hebert and Melissa Anne Hebert v. J. Oran Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Co., So.2d 895 (La.1958), two workers’ compensation cases, neither of which involved a suit in tort.
Hebert v. Richard 72 So. 3d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., , two workers’ compensation cases, neither of which involved a suit in tort.
Kenneth Perry v. Perry & Sons Vault & Grave Service La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
In Humphreys v. Marquette Casualty Co. , So.2d 895 (La.
Perry v. Perry & Sons Vault & Grave Service 872 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
(1958), the supreme court was presented with a similar situation.
Bowens v. General Motors Corp. 608 So. 2d 999 La. 1992
3rd Cir.1979), writ denied, , (1958).
Lafont v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. 545 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Gaffney v. Saenger Theatre Partnership, Ltd. 539 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
overruled on other grounds; (La.App.
Robbins v. Lee 505 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Notwithstanding the Johnson v. Alexander wordage, Lee argues that Robbins was a special employee
Gales v. Gold Bond Bldg. Products 493 So. 2d 611 La. 1986
Flint v. Rockwood Ins. Co. 455 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Kahl v. Baudoin 449 So. 2d 1334 La. 1984
Castle v. Prudhomme Tank Truck Line, Inc. 417 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
(1958), the court refused to allow compensation benefits to the concubine of the deceased employee.
Travelers Ins. Co. v. Paramount Drilling Co. 395 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
489, (1969); , (1958); Lambert v. James A. Teague Rental Equipment, Inc., (La.App.
Fontenot v. Town of Kinder 377 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
In disposing of this issue, the trial court reasoned as follows: "The Supreme Court of Louisiana in Humphreys v. Marquette Casualty Co. (1958) , , declared the obligation of two joint employers to an injured employee to be solidary and, consequently, the court cast the two employers in judgment, in solido, to pay weekly benefits, medical expenses, penalties and attorney's fees.
Thompson v. New Orleans Public Belt RR 373 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Joyner v. Houston Gen. Ins. Co. 368 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Williams v. Mike Queenan Equipment Co. 366 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
LeJeune v. Allstate Ins. Co. 365 So. 2d 471 La. 1978
Overruled Henderson v. Travelers Ins. Co. 354 So. 2d 1031 La. 1978
In doing so, , (1958), which held to the contrary.
Youngblood v. Allstate Fire Ins. Co. 349 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Caesar 345 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
(1958), that concubines are not entitled to death benefits under the workmen's compensation act [5] as dependents.
Henderson v. Travelers Ins. Co. 346 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
(1958) the court did not allow a concubine to recover under LSA-R.S.
Guilbeau v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 338 So. 2d 600 La. 1976
Basco v. State of La., Dept. of Corrections 335 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
60 , ; , ; and Wright v. National Surety Corp ., above.
Campbell v. Kansas City Southern Railroad Co. 297 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Gaspard v. Travelers Insurance Company 284 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Lambert v. James A. Teague Rental Equipment, Inc. 278 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
(1958), is decisive of the issue here posed.
Carney v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 277 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Dickerson v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance 252 So. 2d 457 La. 1971
BARHAM, TATE and DIXON, JJ., , should be overruled insofar as it denies recovery to woman living with and dependent on deceased, but not married to him.
Jackson v. Phoenix Insurance Co. 252 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
60 , ; , ; Wright v. National Surety Corp., 221 La.
Hills v. Travelers Insurance Co. 250 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
60 , ; , ; McClelland v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., .
Dickerson v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin 248 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
(1958), a decision which has not been overruled, he contends this decision is not in keeping with the social purpose of the Workmen's Compensation Statute and should be no longer followed in view of the rulings of the United States Supreme Court in the later cases of Levy v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 68 , 88
McDermott v. Funel 247 So. 2d 567 La. 1971
The sole jurisprudential exception is made in the ease of a dependent concubine herself, , -(1958), an exception still recognized, although the concubine's children and other relatives may receive compensation, see decisions cited in text, if dependent members of the household.
Smith v. Kelly Labor Service 239 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
Hooper v. Wilkinson 225 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
and Maryland Casualty Company v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company [La.App.]
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 224 So. 2d 465 La. 1969
(1958), concluded that such an employee may recover from either or both employers, and *495 that they are solidary obligors as to him.
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Cowan 219 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Pflieger v. Haws 180 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
23:1032; Spanja vs. Thibodaux Boiler Works, (Ct.App.La., Orl., 1941); Dixon vs. Herrin Transportation Co., (Ct.App.La., 2d Cir., 1955); Humphreys vs. Marquette Casualty Co., , (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1958); Casualty Reciprocal Exchange vs. Richey Drilling & Well Service, (Ct.App.La., 3rd Cir.) 1962)."
McClelland v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 180 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
60 , ; Humphreys v. Marquette Casualty Co. (1958), , ; Wright v. National Surety Corporation (1952), 221 La.
Richard v. Landreneau Enterprises 167 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Redding v. Cade 158 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
60 , ; , ; Wright v. National Surety Corp., 221 La.
Miller v. Continental Casualty Co. 146 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Casualty Reciprocal Exch.
Malone v. Plaisance Wholesale Grocery 146 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
In support of that contention, , and Lynch v. Culpepper, (La.App., 2 Cir., 1957), .
Finn v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION 141 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
Cited in this connection are these authorities: Maddox v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, 5 Cir., *868 259 F.2d 51 ; Dodge v. Anderson, 5 Cir., 255 F.2d 246 ; , ; Landry v. Fuselier, 230 La.
Casualty Reciprocal Exch. v. RICHEY DRILL. & W. SERV. 137 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Jagneaux v. Marquette Casualty Company 135 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
837 , ; Humphreys v. Marquette Casualty Co. (1958), , ; Edwards v. Louisiana Forestry Commission (1952), 221 La.
Shuff v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 134 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Co., , ; Fruge v. Pacific Employers Ins.