DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Thibodeaux v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co., 112 So. 2d 423.

20 citing documents.

  • Estate of Lohan v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co. 469 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    (1959) (Where insured has dormant condition which is awakened by an accident the condition is not deemed to be the cause of the loss); Richard v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins.
  • Castilow v. American Home Assurance Co. 351 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    (1959), and the numerous authorities cited there.” ( 294 So.2d at 202 ) Again, in commenting on the factual situation presented by the Martin case, the Court stated: “In this case the arthritic condition was perhaps a potential source of trouble to this insured, but from this record it would not have b
  • Hughes v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance 345 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • DeCuir v. Old Republic Life Insurance 342 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    which rejected contentions similar to defendant’s herein, and allowed recovery for accidental disability under a similar insuring agreement with a somewhat similar exclusion clause at , 428: “ ‘We think that if the accident is the proximate cause of the death and sets in motion or starts
  • Phillips v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 325 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    (1959), where the injury was found to be caused by accidental means and this occurrence awakened a pre-existing congenital condition or infirmity, recovery was granted.
  • Moore v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 302 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    “ , (1959), where the injury was found to be caused by accidental means and this occurrence awakened a pre-existing congenital condition or infirmity, recovery was granted.
  • Martin v. American Benefit Life Insurance Company 294 So. 2d 200 La. 1974
    (1959), and the numerous authorities cited there.
  • Martin v. American Benefit Life Insurance Co. 282 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Among the more recent decisions dealing with the question before us are Moore v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, decided June 11, 1973, La., ; , , and Dennis v. Business Men’s Assurance Company of America, La.App., .
  • Moore v. Prudential Insurance Company of America 278 So. 2d 481 La. 1973
    (1959), where the injury was found to be caused by accidental means and this occurrence awakened a pre-existing congenital condition or infirmity, recovery was granted.
  • Duhon v. COLONIAL LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO. 277 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
  • Hendry v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. 251 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    In affirming a judgment oí the trial court in favor of plaintiff-beneficiary, the Third Circuit Court of Appeal in Richard quoted approvingly from various appellate decisions, , (1959), and Lipscomb v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States, 205 La.
  • McCray v. National Life & Accident Insurance Co. 244 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    it resulted “directly, independently and exclusively of all other causes.” “ ‘In other words, if death would not have occurred when it did but for the injury resulting from the accident, it was the direct, independent, and exclusive cause of death at that time, even though the death was hastened by the diseased condition.’ ” A more recent case, , (1959) relies heavily on that part of the opinion in the Carne-lious case, supra, quoted above.
  • Windham v. Investors Preferred Life Insurance 237 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    (1959), in which the insurance contract contained a clause with a twenty-day limitation similar to the one in the instant case.
  • Burgett v. Stuyvesant Life Insurance 236 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    722 , (1959); Franklin v. Mutual Life Ins.
  • Dennis v. Business Men's Assurance Company of Amer. 175 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
    14 (1936); , (1959), 75 A.L.R.2d 1228 .
  • Harmon v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company 170 So. 2d 646 La. 1965
    Jones v. Standard Life & Accident Insurance Co., La.App., ; , , 75 A.L.R.2d 1228 ; Finley v. Hardware Mutual Insurance Co., 237 La.
  • Harmon v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. 170 So. 2d 646 La. 1965
    Jones v. Standard Life & Accident Insurance Co., La.App., ; , , 75 A.L.R.2d 1228 ; Finley v. Hardware Mutual Insurance Co., 237 La.
  • Tullier v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. 148 So. 2d 601 La. 1963
    75 A.L.R.2d 1228 ; Finley v. Hardware Mutual Insurance Company, 237 La.
  • Militello v. Bankers Life & Casualty Company 141 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    Jones v. Standard Life & Accident Insurance Co., La.App., ; , , 75 A.L. R.2d 1228; Finley v. Hardware Mutual Insurance Co., 237 La.
  • Richard v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 128 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    722 , *808 , in rejecting contentions similar to defendant's herein, and in allowing recovery for accidental disability under a similar insuring agreement with a somewhat similar exclusion clause, at (citations omitted): "`We think that, if the accident is the proximate cause of the death and sets in motion or