DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite White v. Morris, 109 So. 2d 87.

23 citing documents.

  • Palmer v. Palmer 488 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Palmer v. Palmer 476 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    In view of the Louisiana Supreme Court’s , (1959) and of our own holdings in Lewis v. Lewis, supra, Worley v. Worley, supra, (La.App.
  • McGovern v. Tatman 410 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Lewis v. Lewis 404 So. 2d 1230 La. 1981
    148, 160; , (1959); Bienvenue v. Bienvenue, 186 La.
  • Graham v. Metzler 402 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    148 and 160; Golson v. Golson, La., ; , ; Eals v. Swan, 221 La.
  • Overruled Howard v. Howard 409 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    White v. Morris, supra [ , (1959)]; Thorton v. Floyd, 229 La.
  • Lewis v. Lewis 395 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Our Supreme Court, stated on pages 88 and 89 that: “It is well settled that a judgment requiring payment of alimony pendente lite is automatically terminated and of no further effect after the rendition of a final decree of divorce.
  • Tisby v. Tisby 382 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    (1959), where this precise issue was presented, supports this finding.
  • Bruner v. Bruner 373 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
  • Webb v. Webb 357 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    4th Cir. 1972); , (1959); Thornton v. Floyd, 229 La.
  • Halcomb v. Halcomb 352 So. 2d 1013 La. 1977
  • Golson v. Golson 351 So. 2d 100 La. 1977
    148, 160; , (1959); Eals v. Swan, 221 La.
  • Criticized Adoption of Rapp 348 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    [1] White v. Morris, 1959, , , similar to Thornton in its ruling but even less self-explanatory, is also criticized by Pascal, in Work of the Louisiana Supreme Court, 1960, 20 La.L.Rev.
  • Golson v. Golson 341 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    237 , (1956); , (1959); (La.App.
  • Mertens v. Mertens 308 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
  • Hughes v. Hughes 303 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    the court said: "Our jurisprudence is established that alimony pendente lite, both for the wife and the minor children, terminates with a judgment of divorce, , (1959); (La.
  • Manuel v. Broderson 298 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    237 , (1956); , (1959); (La.App.
  • Fellows v. Fellows 267 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
    Worley v. Worley, supra; , (1959); (La.App.
  • Worley v. Worley 247 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
    Our jurisprudence is established that alimony pendente lite, both for the wife and the minor children, terminates with a judgment of divorce, , (1959); (La.
  • Adams v. Adams 243 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
    93 , (1960); , (1959); Starns v. Starns, 174 La.
  • Davidson v. Jenkins 216 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
  • Walker v. Walker 157 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    holding that alimony pendente lite is automatically terminated by a final divorce decree.
  • Viser v. Viser 138 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    It seems clear that 'an award of alimony, pendente lite, terminates upon rendition of a final judgment of divorce in which no provision for the payment of alimony is made; , .