Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. La Borde, 99 So. 2d 11.

20 citing documents.

State v. Pitre 893 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
99 So.2d at 12 (1958), overruled in part, by State v. Gatlin, 241 La.
State of Louisiana v. Kevin James Pitre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
So.2d at 12 (1958), overruled in part, by State v. Gatlin, 241 La.
State v. Amos 849 So. 2d 498 La. 2003
However, , (1958), this Court indicated that the status of victim as an unmarried female for purposes of La.
State v. Dixon 471 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
(1958), there was no affirmative proof from which the jury could have determined that the victim was unmarried.
State v. Allen 440 So. 2d 1330 La. 1983
[2] For a discussion of Louisiana law in this respect predating the present Code of Criminal Procedure, , (1958); State v. Gatlin, 241 La.
State v. Joseph 425 So. 2d 1261 La. 1983
Defendant also argues that the victim's testimony regarding her marital status is insufficient to prove beyond a , (1958).
State v. Mathews 375 So. 2d 1165 La. 1979
1000 , 840-41 (1960); , (1958).
State v. Elzie 343 So. 2d 712 La. 1977
1000 , (1960); , (1958).
State v. Williams 310 So. 2d 513 La. 1975
1000 , (1960); , (1958).
State v. Nixon 308 So. 2d 788 La. 1975
See State v. Douglas, La., (1973); , (1958); State v. Holder, 159 La.
State v. Pryor 306 So. 2d 675 La. 1975
1000 , (1960); , (1958).
State v. Champagne 206 So. 2d 518 La. 1968
State v. Vines 162 So. 2d 332 La. 1964
State v. McIlvaine 160 So. 2d 566 La. 1964
235 , ; , ; see State v. Haddad, 221 La.
State v. McIlvaine 160 So. 2d 566 La. 1964
235 , ; , ; see State v. Haddad, 221 La.
State v. Forsythe 144 So. 2d 536 La. 1962
State v. Gatlin 129 So. 2d 4 La. 1961
In all of the cases prior to State v. LaBorde, 1958, , , in which the defendants were discharged under motions for new trials (see State v. Nomey, 204 La.
State v. Miller 111 So. 2d 108 La. 1959
Being aware of the rule of law that in prosecutions in which the State fails to produce any evidence establishing one or more of the elements of the crime of which an accused stands convicted, he will be discharged— , — we have carefully reviewed the evidence herein; and we find that at the time the defendant had sexual intercourse with the prosecuting witness, her state of mind was confused and abnormal.
State v. Daniels 109 So. 2d 896 La. 1959
State v. La Borde 99 So. 2d 15 La. 1958
However, in view of our decision on defendant’s appeal, in which we have reversed his conviction and ordered him discharged ( , ), this matter has become moot.