Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Monteleone v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE CO., 120 So. 2d 70.
-
Mark Landry v. Louisiana Citizens Property Ins. Corp.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
733, (1960); Hemel v. State Farm Mut.
-
Landry v. Louisiana Citizens Prop. Ins. Co.
964 So. 2d 463
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Co., , (1960); Hemel v. State Farm Mut.
-
Wallace v. First Assur. Life of America
862 So. 2d 374
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Co., , (1960); Edwards v. Life & Cas.
-
Wickramasekra v. ASSOC. INTERN. INS. CO.
890 So. 2d 569
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Co., , (1960); Edwards v. Life & Cas.
-
Cowen v. Mercury Finance Co.
607 So. 2d 1067
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Co., , Edwards v. Life & Cas.
-
Veillon v. US Fire Ins. Co.
590 So. 2d 1368
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Co., , (1960); Edwards v. Life & Cas.
-
Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Joe Dean Contr.
584 So. 2d 1226
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Co., , (1960); Edwards v. Life & Cas.
-
Humphrey v. Aetna Life & Casualty Insurance Co.
572 So. 2d 105
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Co., , Edwards v. Life & Cas.
-
Pareti v. Sentry Indem. Co.
536 So. 2d 417
La. 1988
Co., , Edwards v. Life & Cas.
-
Pointe Coupee Lumber Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
424 So. 2d 1096
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
In denying recovery, the court relied on a definition of the term “conveyed by a messenger” which appeared in Monteleone v. American Employers’ Insurance Co., , (1960), which stated that the phrase “denotes conveyance by a person on an errand who keeps the property in his personal custody at all times.” In this case, the trial judge found that Campbell had deviated from his function as a messenger for two full days, and that the deposit was therefore not being
-
Cameron State Bank v. American Emp. Ins. Co.
401 So. 2d 1090
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
(1960) and Sansone v. American Insurance Company, 245 La.
- Case v. Reliance Insurance 355 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
-
Allen & Allen, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
295 So. 2d 894
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
(1960) the trial judge stated: "It does not seem to be necessary to an understanding of the word `convey' that there be any indication as to whether the conveying is fast or slow, direct or indirect, or with or without temporary interruptions or periodic rests, ...."
-
Atlas Lubricant Corp. v. Federal Ins. Co. of NJ
293 So. 2d 550
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
733 , (1960); Hemel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
-
Moore v. Prudential Insurance
263 So. 2d 456
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Co., , ; Muse v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
-
Sherwood v. Stein
259 So. 2d 876
La. 1972
Monteleone v. American Employers’ Insurance Company, , (1960); Hemel v. State Farm Mutual Auto.
-
Sherwood v. Stein
244 So. 2d 647
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1971
Co., , ; Hemel v. State Farm Mut.
- Bezue v. HARTFORD ACC. & INDEM. CO., HARTFORD, CONN. 224 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
-
Herring v. American Bankers Insurance Company
216 So. 2d 137
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
Co., , ; Hemel v. State Farm Mut.
- Morgan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 195 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
-
Sansone v. American Insurance
160 So. 2d 575
La. 1964
Pertinent here are the pronouncements of this Court in Monteleone v. American Employers’ Insurance Co., , , concerning conveyance by a messenger: “The above-cited definitions of the word ‘convey’ all suggest not only ‘the idea of passing from one place to another place’ but also the idea that the thing which is ‘passing from one place to another place’ is being accompanied to its destination.
-
Finch v. Baton Rouge Production Credit Association
154 So. 2d 60
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
"Certainly it may be argued that the 12 month expiration date controls over the above quoted provision, but the law in this State is that ambiguities in contracts of insurance will be construed in favor of the insured, , ; Schonberg v. New York Life Ins.
-
Sansone v. American Insurance
152 So. 2d 605
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Our former opinion, guided by the Supreme Court ruling in Monteleone v. American Employers’ Insurance Company, , (1960), denied recovery under the policy provisions for the reason that Cefalu, Sansone’s messenger, did not keep the money in his personal custody at all times.
- Liprie v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Co. 143 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
- Murry v. Southern Pulpwood Insurance Company 136 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
- Fullilove v. US Casualty Company of New York 125 So. 2d 389 La. 1960
-
Sumrall v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company
124 So. 2d 168
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Co., , ; Hemel v. State Farm Mut.