Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Brown v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 101 So. 2d 696.

42 citing documents.

  • Brown v. US Fire Ins. Co. 671 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • Weatherford v. Commercial Union Ins. 650 So. 2d 763 La. 1995
    Ins., , (1958); (La.App.
  • Sneed v. Satcher 597 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    (1958), reached this conclusion, and Barnes v. State Farm, supra, applied the principle to facts similar to the instant case: [W]hen children are accompanied by their parents or other adults, the degree of care diminishes because it is only reasonable for a prudent person to assume, in the absence of a
  • Antley v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA 539 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • Dufrene v. Dixie Auto Ins. Co. 373 So. 2d 162 La. 1979
    (1958); Llorens v. McCann, 187 La.
  • Thrasher v. Leggett 373 So. 2d 494 La. 1979
    [5] See, , (1958) in which the Court defined the standard under Article 2315 as a "common-sense test ...
  • Galliano v. Lirette 339 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Co., , as follows: ‘Liability for damages under Article 2315 of the Civil Code is founded upon fault and whether or not fault exists depends upon the facts and circumstances presented in each particular case.
  • Pence v. Ketchum 326 So. 2d 831 La. 1976
  • Messick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 306 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    3 Cir. 1969); , (1958); (La.App.
  • Welborne v. Southern Farm Bureau Insurance 305 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    (1958); Comer v. Travelers Insurance Company, 213 La.
  • Smolinski v. Taulli 276 So. 2d 286 La. 1973
  • Vernon v. Allstate Insurance Co. 268 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Collins v. Allstate Insurance 264 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    Pierre v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Company, La.App., (1970) , (1958), as supportive of its contention that Miss Harang was without fault.
  • Lee v. Willis 253 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Aucoin v. Lodrigues 252 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Murphy v. Head 240 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Co., , , ‘whether or not fault exists depends upon the facts and circumstances presented in each particular case.
  • Young v. Morvant 232 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    As this court said in Bloodworth v. Hutchinson, La.App., , , , 698: “We think the Court of Appeal erred in that it imposed on Devall a higher standard of care than justified by the facts of the case.
  • Pierre v. Connecticut Fire Insurance 232 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Co., , , “whether or not fault exists depends upon the facts and circumstances presented in each particular case.
  • Barnes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 229 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
  • Favalora v. Travelers Insurance Co. 223 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Guidry v. Hamlin, La.App., 188 So.
  • Bryan v. Durr 209 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Kessinger v. Ashford, La.
  • Allien v. Louisiana Power & Light Company 202 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    Co., , ; Fontana v. State Farm Mutual Auto.
  • Miller v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 189 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    Co., , ; Fontana v. State Farm Mutual Auto.
  • Waller v. King 188 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
    Co., , ; State v. Vinzant, 200 La.
  • Goff v. Carlino 181 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    Co., , ; Fontana v. State Farm Mutual Auto.
  • Hicks v. Nelson 182 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Co., , ; Fontana v. State Farm Mutual Auto.
  • Dartez v. City of Sulphur 179 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
    Co., , ; Fontana v. State Farm Mutual Auto.
  • Fontana v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 173 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
  • PIGGLY-WIGGLY OP. WRHSE. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 174 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
    787 (1920); , (1958); , La.App., 2d Cir., 1959; , La.App., 3d Cir.1964 (writ refused); 65 C.J.S.
  • Williams v. Charles 171 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    Kessinger v. Ashford, La.App., ; Ferrara v. Allstate Insurance Co., La.App., ; Bloodworth v. Hutchinson, La.App., ; Schuster v. Audubon Insurance Company, La.App., ; Layfield v. Bourgeois, La.App., ; Gross v. Zeringue, La.App., 58
  • Roy v. United Gas Corporation 163 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    Co., , , "* * * whether or not fault exists depends upon the facts and circumstances in each particular case.
  • Tucker v. Travelers Insurance Company 160 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
    Co., , ; State v. Vinzant, 200 La.
  • Juneau v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance 156 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    As the lower court stated, “ * * * we are asked to apply a physical law without evidence of its applicability.” , as follows: “Liability for damages under Article 2315 of the Civil Code is founded upon fault and whether or not fault exists depends upon the facts and circumstances presented in each particular ease.
  • Kramer v. Etie 155 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Co., , , our Supreme Court announced: “Liability for damages under Article 2315 of the Civil Code is founded upon fault and whether or not fault exists depends upon the facts and circumstances presented in each particular case.
  • Valenti v. Allstate Insurance 156 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    The degree of care to be exercised must be always commensurate with the foreseeable dangers confronting the alleged wrongdoer.” , .
  • Covington v. Loffland Bros. Co. 152 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    Co., , , our Supreme Court announced: “Liability for damages under Article 2315 of the Civil Code is founded upon fault and whether or not fault exists depends upon the facts and circumstances presented in each particular case.
  • Bloodworth v. Hutchinson 150 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    888 ; , ; Comer v. Travelers Ins.
  • Larned v. Wallace 146 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    Co., , as follows: "Liability for damages under Article 2315 of the Civil Code is founded upon fault and whether or not fault exists depends upon the facts and circumstances presented in each particular case.
  • Clair v. Gaudet 144 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    Burnaman v. LaPrairie, La.App., ; Gray v. Great American Indemnity Company, La.App., ; Walker v. Jarnevich, La.App., ; , .
  • David v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 122 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    It has been said that the duty of one who voluntarily undertakes to care for and assist such a person is the same as that of one who is legally obligated to render such care or assistance.” , , at page 698, liability under Louisiana Law is discussed as follows: “ * * * Liability for damages under Article 2315 of the Civil Code is founded upon fault, and whether or not fault exists depends upon the facts and circumstances presented in each particular case.
  • Henderson v. Shewbart 112 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    Although plaintiffs urge that Shewbart should have veered right instead of applying his brakes, “In determining fault, a common-sense test is to be applied- — that is —how would a reasonably prudent man have acted or what precautions would he have taken if faced with similar conditions and circumstances?”, , , at page 698.
  • Wiley v. Sutphin 108 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
    Co., , ; State v. Vinzant, 200 La.