DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lemonier v. Coco, 112 So. 2d 436.

34 citing documents.

  • Mark Stephen Jaskot and Diane M. Robertson Jaskot v. Lyle K. Doublet and Riverside Inspections, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
  • Guillory v. Hebert 31 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Connell v. Davis 940 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    (1959); appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • David v. Thibodeaux 916 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    -66 , -39 (La.1959); Sanders v. Earnest, 34,656, p. 29 (La.App.
  • Tarifa v. Riess 856 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • Sells v. Puls 711 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • Destefano v. Crump 694 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • Dodson v. Walker 645 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    : In a successful action for a reduction of the purchase price the amount to be awarded is the difference, at the time of the sale, between the value of the thing sold in its defective condition and its value *1155 as warranted.
  • Doell v. Lachney 544 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    `the cost of repairs necessary to make the thing whole.'" , (citations omitted), appeal after remand (La.App.
  • Dodd v. Tucker 528 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    (1959), also a quanti minoris case, the matter was remanded to the trial court for the taking of additional evidence because the purchaser failed to prove to a reasonable certainty the amount of the reduction to which he was entitled.
  • Truelove v. Easley 521 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    However, in Pursell v. Kelly, 152 So2d 36 (La.1963), n. 4 at 39, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "In our recent cases ( , , citing McEachern v. Plauche Lumber & Construction Co., Inc., 220 La.
  • Castjohn v. Hepplewhite Homes, Inc. 501 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Verbick v. RGC Investments, Inc. 477 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • Smith v. Chang 467 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    (1959); Slagle v. Morgan, supra .
  • Foret v. Kennedy 459 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • Tardo v. Seither 452 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    It is well established that “the amount to be awarded is the difference, at the time of the sale, between the value of the thing sold in its defective condition and its value as warranted.” , at 438 (1959), (La.App.
  • A Better Place, Inc. v. Giani Inv. Co. 445 So. 2d 728 La. 1984
    art. 2082, 2164; , (1959).
  • D'ANGELO v. Poche 434 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    It is true, as stated by the seller, that in an action for quanti minoris involving the sale of realty, under some prior jurisprudence [ , and McEachern v. Plauche Lumber & Construction Co., 220 La.
  • Thornton v. Pedersen 421 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Slagle v. Morgan 410 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    (1959) ("[T]he allowable diminution is `the amount necessary to convert the unsound structure into a sound one.'" 112 So.2d at 438 ).
  • Bustamante v. Manale 397 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    323 , -40, n. 4 , foresaw this case from defendant's view: In our recent cases ( , , citing McEachern v. Plauche Lumber & Construction Co., Inc., 220 La.
  • Betz v. Reynaud Construction Co. 396 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    See Lemonier v. Coco, 1959, , .
  • Leathers v. Mobile Home Brokers, Inc. 382 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Firmin v. Frantom 354 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • Verlander v. Hoffer 351 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    (1959), the Supreme Court of Louisiana observed: "In a successful action for a reduction of the purchase price the amount to be awarded is the difference, at the time of the sale, between the value of the thing sold in its defective condition and its value as warranted.
  • Lorio v. Kaizer 277 So. 2d 633 La. 1973
  • Montgomery v. State ex rel. Department of Highways 231 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Brown v. Dauzat 157 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
  • Fitzmorris v. Kelly 152 So. 2d 36 La. 1963
    In our recent cases ( , , citing McEachern v. Plauche Lumber & Construction Co., Inc., 220 La.
  • Stack v. Irwin 144 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    642 , ; , ; Harding v. Ed. Taussig Edsel Motors, Inc., La.App., ; Cipriano v. Superior Realty & Construction Corp., 228 La.
  • Delta Equipment & Construction Co. v. Cook 142 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
  • Lemonier v. Coco 130 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • Russell v. Bartlett 139 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    and Deshotel v. Higgins, La.App., 109 So.
  • State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Bates 129 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961