Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of Alexandria v. Jones, 108 So. 2d 528.

20 citing documents.

BOARD OF COM'RS OF TENSAS v. Crawford 731 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State, Dept. of Trans. & Dev. v. Boagni 509 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
STATE, THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Townsend 473 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development v. Townsend 473 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State, Dept. of Transp. & Develop. v. Taylor 461 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. McTeague 244 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Colomb 225 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
721 , ; , ; Parish of Iberia v. Cook, 238 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Mason 218 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
(1959); State through Dept. of Highways v. Barrow, 238 La.
Texas Pipe Line Company v. Stein 190 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
State, Department of Highways v. Burden 180 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
In the case of City of Alexandria v. R. J. Jones et al. (1959), , , the law that damage *790 must not be anticipated was clearly stated by the Supreme Court: "`The general law involved in this case is simply that the owner is entitled to the market value at the time of the expropriation and market value is what a willing purchaser will pay a willing seller under ordi
State, Department of Highways v. Dodge 168 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
State, through Dept. of Highways v. Gani, La.App.
Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Mire 140 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
425 , and those damages which are anticipated, remote and speculative, Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Barbe, supra; , .
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Madden 139 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Mississippi River Bridge Authority v. Gwin 138 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Gras 141 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
378 , (1960) ; , (1959); Efurd v. City of Shreveport, 235 La.
State v. Clarke 135 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
(1959); Efurd v. City of Shreveport, 235 La.
State v. Hedwig, Inc. 133 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
State v. Crockett 131 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
wherein the court, in quoting from the opinion of the trial judge, stated: "`Recent sales of comparable properties are the best criteria of values in expropriation proceedings, and if there are no comparable sales, ascertainment of true value is sought by consideration of other factors under the
Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Harang 131 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
425 , and those damages which are anticipated, remote and speculative, Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Barbe, supra; , .
Town of Golden Meadow v. Duet 121 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
988 , , and cases therein cited * * * , and Plaquemines Parish School Board v. La Grange Realty Co., Inc., La.App., .