Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Youngblood v. Robison, 118 So. 2d 431.
-
Biggs v. Verbois
151 So. 2d 172
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
527 , ; , ; Henderson v. Central Mutual Ins.
- Emmco Insurance v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. 151 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
-
Schexnayder v. Martin
150 So. 2d 616
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1963
Washington Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. Williams, La.App., .
-
Allen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
151 So. 2d 122
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
2d 919 , ; and (2) in holding that although the driver of the Ford automobile entered the intersection on a green light, she did not have the right to proceed through the intersection after the light changed which ruling is contrary to the jurisprudence as established, inter alia, by Potts v. United States Fide
-
Sittig v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
149 So. 2d 424
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
The acts of negligence attributed to him while operating his truck in obedience to positive law do not convince us that they were most substantial, and that they were such direct factors that without them the accident or intersectional collision would not have occurred, in view of the circumstances then existing.” , , the court said: “This Court has given implied recognition to this distinction and has specifically held that it is not necessary for one intending to traverse an intersection on a
- Williams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 148 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
-
McDonald v. Bramel
147 So. 2d 68
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Youngblood v. Robison (1960), , ; Henderson v. Central Mutual Insurance Company et al. (1959), 238 La.
-
Washington Fire & Marine Insurance v. Williams
144 So. 2d 737
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
With all due respect to our learned brother below, we feel that under the recent *739 , 239 La.
-
Martin v. Broussard
142 So. 2d 821
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
In regard to the responsibility of a motorist in approaching an intersection controlled by a traffic light, , : “ * * * When an intersection is controlled by a stop sign, the motorist on the favored street, as stated in the Koob case, is entitled to indulge in the assumption that any driver approaching from the less favored street will bring his car to a complete stop before entering the intersection.
- George v. Barros 142 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
-
Marbury v. Arnold
142 So. 2d 507
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
144 , , , as follows : “We are living in an advanced stage of the motor age.
-
Williamson v. Stephens
140 So. 2d 743
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
486 , ; , ; Bryant v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Company, 239 La.
-
Emmco Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
138 So. 2d 822
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
[338,] ; Bryant v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Inc., [239] La., [83,] ; Henderson v. Central Mutual Insurance Company, 238 La.
-
Dilworth v. Roberts
138 So. 2d 453
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
250 , ; , ; Randall v. Baton Rouge Bus Company, 240 La.
-
Wells v. Causey
137 So. 2d 693
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
250 , , .’” The only question raised as to the damages awarded by the trial judge was that of the plaintiff seeking to have the award of $2,500.00 for the injuries, pain and suffering of Harold Wells increased to the sum of $7,500.00.
-
Homeland Insurance Co. of America v. Marshall
138 So. 2d 237
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Bryant v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 239 La.
- Dupuy v. Maury 136 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
-
Le Beau v. Baton Rouge Bus Co.
136 So. 2d 740
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
250 , ; , ; Randall v. Baton Rouge Bus Company, 240 La.
-
Plunkett v. Department of Highways
135 So. 2d 74
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
250 , ; , ; Randall v. Baton Rouge Bus Company, 240 La.
- Faulkner v. Ryder Tank Lines, Inc. 135 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
-
Shaw v. Globe Indemnity Company
134 So. 2d 609
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
We eliminate from consideration in this case the question as to whether Mrs. Shaw could and should have observed the approach of the ambulance, , , and Bryant v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 239 La.
- Collins v. Purkey 134 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
-
Benoit v. Vincent
132 So. 2d 75
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
527 , ; , ; Henderson v. Central Mutual Ins.
- Patterson v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company 131 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
-
Guarisco v. Swindle
132 So. 2d 635
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
903 , ; , ; Robinson v. Great American Indemnity Company et al., La.App., ; Gautreaux v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Company, et al., La.App., ; McLehaney v. Great American Indemnity Co. et al., La.App., ; Livaccari v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc., Norman Merlan and Royal
-
Warner v. Insurance Co. of State of Pennsylvania
129 So. 2d 320
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
250 , ; and Youngblood v. Robison, 1960, , .
-
McCoy v. State Farm Mutual Ins. Co.
129 So. 2d 66
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
250 , ; , ; Hernandez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
-
Noonan v. London Guarantee and Accident Company
128 So. 2d 918
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Youngblood v. Robison, 1960, , , and numerous cases cited therein.
-
Smith v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
128 So. 2d 235
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
We deem the general principle enunciated in the case of Youngblood v. Robison, 1960, , , 434 to be applicable herein.
-
Andrea v. Hicks
125 So. 2d 251
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
For the driver with the right of way is ordinarily entitled to proceed toward and into an intersection upon the assumption that inferior traffic will respect his superior right to proceed ( , ; Henderson v. Central Mutual Ins.
-
Stansbury v. Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance
124 So. 2d 799
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
The same principle has been recently emphasized, although the point at issue involved an intersection controlled by traffic signal lights, , .
- Derouen v. American Employers Insurance Company 123 So. 2d 896 La. 1960
-
Winningham v. Weir
123 So. 2d 794
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
83 , ; and Youngblood v. Robison et al., 1960, , .
-
Carr v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance
124 So. 2d 198
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
250 , ; Youngblood v. Robison, 1960, , .
- Robinson v. Great American Indemnity Co. 120 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
-
Allen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
120 So. 2d 372
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Youngblood v. Robison, La., ; Bryant v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Inc., La., ; Henderson v. Central Mutual Insurance Company, 238 La.