DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Thibodeaux, 116 So. 2d 525.

18 citing documents.

  • Succession of Michelle Beth Roy Booth and Robert Mark Booth, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    In So.2d 525 [(1959)], we reiterated a basic principle of construction of wills, that the validity of a will is to be maintained if possible.
  • In the Matter of the Succession of John Robert Biscamp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    In So.2d 525 [ (1959) ], we reiterated a basic principle of construction of wills, that the validity of a will is to be maintained if possible.
  • In re the Succession of Biscamp 211 So. 3d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    In , [ (1959) ], we reiterated a basic principle of construction of wills, that the validity of a will is to be maintained if possible.
  • Succession of Henderson 191 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • Succession of Holbrook 144 So. 3d 845 La. 2014
    In , [ (1959) ], we reiterated a basic principle of construction of wills, that the validity of a will is to be maintained if possible.
  • Succession of Brown 458 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • Succession of Jacque 424 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Succession of Dilley 422 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
    In , , the Supreme Court of Louisiana reiterated a basic principle of construction of wills, "that the validity of a will is to be maintained if possible".
  • Succession of Porche 273 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1973
    In , , we reiterated a basic principle of construction of wills, that the validity of a will is to be maintained if possible.
  • Estate of Moreau v. Moreau 261 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
    4th Cir., 1968); , (1959); cf. Succession of Morgan, 257 La.
  • Succession of Barnett 245 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    It is subject to no other form, and may be made anywhere, even out of the State.” In resolving this issue, we must adhere to the rules and policies set forth by the Supreme Court in , (1959): “The policy of our law is to maintain the validity of a will, if possible.
  • McCullough v. Bridges 245 So. 2d 319 La. 1971
    In , , we reiterated a basic principle of construction of wills, that the validity of a will is to be maintained if possible.
  • Succession of Veal 242 So. 2d 551 La. 1970
    In , , we reiterated a basic principle of construction of wills, that the validity of a will is to be maintained if possible.In construing an attestation clause we will not require strict, technical, and pedantic compliance in form or in language.
  • Succession of Morgan 242 So. 2d 551 La. 1970
    In , , we reiterated a basic principle of construction of wills, that the validity of a will is to be maintained if possible.
  • Succession of Hammett 183 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    (1959); Lebleu v. Manning, 225 La.
  • Succession of Shows 158 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    103 , ; , ; Succession of Fertel, 208 La.
  • Valliere v. Anderson 159 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    In , , as in the instant case, the evidence was conflicting as to whether the testatrix was able to read at the time she purportedly executed a statutory will.
  • Jeanfreau v. Sanderson 117 So. 2d 907 La. 1960