Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wampler v. Wampler, 118 So. 2d 423.

23 citing documents.

Kincade v. Midroc Oil Co. 769 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
(1960), where an assignment of mineral leases which was subject to suspensive conditions was insufficient to create an -ownership interest in those mineral leases, because the “[Cjondi-tions suspended the obligation of the assignment, which was not binding or enforceable against either party until
Liberty Rice Mill, Inc. v. Simon 667 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Revised Civil Code Articles 2043, 2471 (which deals with completed sales), , [(1960)].
Guste v. Hibernia Nat. Bank in New Orleans 655 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
(1960) (emphasis added).
Dawson v. Dawson 610 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Burford v. Burford 541 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Gulf Federal Savings Bank v. Zoblotsky 496 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Abadie v. Oubre 467 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Tullier v. Tullier 450 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Wood v. Wood, supra; (La.App.
Wood v. Wood 424 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Broadway v. Broadway 417 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Decatur-St. Louis Combined Equity Properties, Inc. Venture v. Abercrombie 411 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
DECATUR-ST. LOUIS, ETC. v. Abercrombie 411 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Arnett v. Trace Development Corp. 407 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
356 , (1963); , (1960); Bernheim v. Pessou, 143 La.
Due v. Due 342 So. 2d 161 La. 1977
an aleatory contract, Articles 1776, 2982, which creates no obligation until the happening of the event; (2) Even if the contingent fee contract is a conditional obligation creating contemporaneously a right to enforce it upon happening of the condition, Article 2041, the right so created is only of specific enforcement, not to vest it retroactively to the contract's creation, , (1960); (3) Further, however classified, the contingent fee contract has no ascertainable value prior to successful co
King v. Hutchinson 303 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Revised Civil Code Articles 2043, 2471 (which deals with completed sales), , .” Similarly in the instant case, the clause that the seller “deliver a merchantable title” annulled the contract when that event did not happen within the stipulated time.
Meza v. Fidelity Homestead Ass'n 271 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Fisher v. Fisher 261 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(1960), and Zemurray v. Boe, 235 La.
Fontenot v. Fontenot 175 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Bornemann v. Richards 161 So. 2d 741 La. 1964
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Lewis 159 So. 2d 132 La. 1963
1 On the other hand, it is Lewis’ contention, in which he was upheld by the district court, that title to these royalties did not pass until the document was delivered to him on November 29, 1959, at which time the community which formerly existed had been dissolved, therefore, the royalties became his separate property, , .
Hayes v. Muller 158 So. 2d 191 La. 1963
(1960) is sound authority for the position that when the suit is not between the parties to the contract of assignment of an oil lease, but where the controversy is between one of these parties in whose favor the assignment is given and a third person, “the parol evidence rule is without relevance as i
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Lewis 150 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
After a trial on the merits, the judge of the district court held that the property in controversy was the separate property of plaintiff, Pierson Lewis, , .
Jackson Motors, Inc. v. Calvert Fire Insurance Co. 120 So. 2d 478 La. 1960
386 , ; , , opinion rendered Feb.