Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pilgrim v. Pilgrim, 102 So. 2d 864.
-
Billiot v. Rivere
378 So. 2d 512
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Hayes *515 v. Hayes, 225 La.
-
Usie v. Bonvillain
348 So. 2d 728
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
(1958).” Plaintiff’s evidence consisted of her own testimony and that of her sister, Clara Bell Dufrene, and a friend, Rose Verdin.
- Breaux v. Breaux 323 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
- Broussard v. Broussard 320 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
- Grappe v. Grappe 315 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
-
Veazey v. Nassar
285 So. 2d 263
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
(1958); Harris v. Harris, 228 La.
- Pugh v. Pugh 283 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
-
Dubois v. Falgout
268 So. 2d 70
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
“ , , the court stated the rule another way, and that is that the degree of proof must be so convincing as to exclude any other reasonable hypothesis other than that of guilt.” (Emphasis ours.)
-
Antony v. Antony
160 So. 2d 765
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
374 , ; , ; Fister v. Fister, La.App.
-
Morris v. Morris
152 So. 2d 291
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
374 , ; , ; Baasen v. Baasen, La.App., .
-
Bosch v. Girradot
143 So. 2d 284
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1962
can be differentiated from the instant case.
-
Baasen v. Baasen
133 So. 2d 908
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
From an analysis of the evidence in this case, , -866 , wherein it was stated: "It is the well-settled jurisprudence that the unfaithfulness of a spouse may be established by indirect or circumstantial evidence forasmuch as, in the nature of things, adulterous acts can seldom be proven by direct or positive testimony.
-
Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society v. Arceneaux
112 So. 2d 148
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
It shows that the appellant wife and the corespondent were surprised together in the bedroom of a darkened and locked house under circumstances strongly indicating adultery (cf., , ), and that on the day following this incident they moved into an apartment on Baton Rouge Avenue and lived together for a month before' the divorce.
-
Fontenot v. Fontenot
102 So. 2d 866
La. 1958
This is a companion case to that of Pilgrim v. Pilgrim, La.Sup., .