Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Langlinais v. David, 289 So. 2d 343.
- Blanchard v. Blanchard 697 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
-
Little v. Little
513 So. 2d 464
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Noting that the weight of Louisiana authority is to the effect that at dissolution, the non-employed spouse is entitled to recognition of an interest in proceeds from a deferred compensation plan when they become payable, it expressly disapproved (and overruled insofar as it is inconsistent with its holding) (La.App.
- Lovell v. Lovell 490 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
Walker v. Walker
463 So. 2d 912
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Also see and compare LRS 40:1442.2 (La.App.
- Miller v. Miller 405 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
- Sims v. Sims 358 So. 2d 919 La. 1978
- Jarred v. Jarred 355 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
-
Sims v. Sims
349 So. 2d 974
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
App.], (3rd Cir. 1974); 2.
-
Moon v. Moon
345 So. 2d 168
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
As authority for his decision, (La.App.
- TL James & Co., Inc. v. Montgomery 332 So. 2d 834 La. 1976
-
Roberts v. Roberts
325 So. 2d 674
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
The district court held defendant's interest in the retirement fund and/or monthly benefits was community property
- Swope v. Mitchell 324 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
- TL James & Co., Inc. v. Montgomery 308 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975