DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kendrick v. Kendrick, 106 So. 2d 707.

77 citing documents.

  • Whitt v. Vauthier 295 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
  • Politz v. Traders & General Insurance Co. 285 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    (1958); Readco Industries, Inc. v. Myrmax Specialties, Inc., (La.App.
  • Andrews v. Williams 281 So. 2d 120 La. 1973
    137 , (1964); , (1958); Moore v. Angiolette, 12 Mart.
  • Bergeron v. Parish Lumber Home Improvements, Inc. 255 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Factual conclusions by the trial judge are entitled to great weight and will not be disturbed upon appellate review in the absence of manifest error, especially when they are based upon an evaluation of the credibility of opposing witnesses, , (1958); Orlando v. Polito, 228 La.
  • Slack v. Fleet 242 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Factual conclusions of the trier of fact, especially those based upon evaluation of credibility of witnesses, will not be disturbed on appeal unless manifestly erroneous, , (1958); Orlando v. Polito, 228 La.
  • Adler v. Adler 239 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
    Olivier v. Abunza, 226 La.
  • Guillory v. Johnson 238 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    (1958) ; Orlando v. Polito, 228 La.
  • Trahan v. Continental Insurance Co. 237 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    (1958); Orlando v. Polito, 228 La.
  • Readco Industries, Inc. v. Myrmax Specialties, Inc. 236 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    (1958); Orlando v. Polito, 228 La.
  • Lang v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 230 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    (1958); Orlando v. Polito, 228 La.
  • Tipton v. Loker 230 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    (1958); Orlando v. Polito, 228 La.
  • Vignes v. Vignes 205 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Harless v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 164 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Doucet v. Doucet 158 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    345 ; , ; Rogers v. Rogers, 239 La.
  • Savage v. Haynes 146 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Pierre v. Galloway, La.App.
  • Niemann v. Seeling 133 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    971 , ; Kendrick v. Kendrick, supra [ , ].” It was pointed out in Sampognaro v. Sampognaro, supra, that: “Whether or not the plaintiff, under this doctrine, has proved by a preponderance of the evidence the allegations of cruelty made in his petition is a question that addresses itself to the weight to be afforded the testimony of the witnes
  • Chapman v. Chapman 130 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
  • Bernard v. Broussard 128 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    .” In the case of Bush v. Bush, 232 La.
  • Primus v. Primus 129 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    102 , ; Kendrick v. Kendrick, 1958, , ; Vinot v. Vinot, 1960, 239 La.
  • Harris v. Harris 127 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    971 , ; Kendrick v. Kendrick [ , ], supra."
  • Lyles v. Lyles 126 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Kendrick v. Kendrick, 1958, , .
  • Knighten v. American Automobile Insurance Co. 121 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    See Kendrick v. Kendrick, 1958, , ; Orlando v. Polito, 1955, 228 La.
  • Rogers v. Lasseigne 120 So. 2d 462 La. 1960
  • Vinot v. Bordelon 119 So. 2d 474 La. 1960
  • Coltharp v. Hearin Tank Lines, Inc. 118 So. 2d 881 La. 1960
    and the cases cited therein.” Counsel for appellants argues in this Court that the position of the physical damages on the two trucks proves that it was the Coltharp truck which struck the Hearin truck first.
  • Vinzant v. L. L. Brewton Pulpwood Co. 118 So. 2d 117 La. 1960
    and the •cases cited therein.
  • Jenkins v. Audubon Insurance Company 110 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    Pierre v. Galloway, La.App.