Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Vinot v. Bordelon, 119 So. 2d 474.

15 citing documents.

Bell v. Bell 368 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
The cases relied on by defendant, , (1960) (La.
Bruner v. Bruner 364 So. 2d 1015 La. 1978
Hermes v. Hermes 327 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
She relies on the cases of Fulmer v. Fulmer, La., (S.Ct.), , , Vicknair v. Vicknair, 237 La.
Broussard v. Broussard 320 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Davidson v. Jenkins 216 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
Richards v. Garth, 223 La.
Smith v. Smith 216 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
McWaters v. McWaters 209 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
172 ; Seeling v. Seeling, La.App., 4 Cir., ; , ; Clay v. Clay, 221 La.
Walker v. Walker 157 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
Carriere v. Carriere 147 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
denied); , ; Clay v. Clay, 221 La.
Niemann v. Seeling 133 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
there was hopeless conflict between the testimony of the wife and the husband.
Chapman v. Chapman 130 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Bernard v. Broussard 128 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
in which the court held as follows: “Under the provisions of Article 160 of our Civil Code the wife in a case such as this is entitled to alimony if she has not been at fault.
Primus v. Primus 129 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
34 , ; Vinot v. Vinot, 1960, , ; and Rogers v. Rogers, 1960, 239 La.
Harris v. Harris 127 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
and Rogers v. Rogers, 239 La.
Lyles v. Lyles 126 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Vinot v. Vinot, 1960, , .