Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lands v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 120 So. 2d 74.

15 citing documents.

Succession of David Jones, Jr. A/K/A David Jones, III A/K/A David Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
4 An exception to the general rule is the “second in time” So.2d 74 (1960).
In Re Succession of Jones 6 So. 3d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
pAn exception to the general rule is the “second in time” , (1960).
Succession of City v. Succession of Manuel 469 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
(1960), [Footnote omitted], our Supreme Court stated as follows: “We are in full accord with the majority view that a presumption exists as to the validity of a second marriage and that the burden of proof to show that it is a nullity is on the party attacking it.
Zanders v. Heirs of Zanders 434 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
The Supreme Court in Gathright, supra, , (1960): “(1) there is a presumption of the validity of a second marriage and the burden of proving invalidity is upon the party attacking it, (2) the presumption of validity does not run in favor of a spouse who has been shown to have a prior undissolved marriage, unless that spouse can show that he or
Gathright v. Smith 368 So. 2d 679 La. 1979
(1960), the case upon which they purportedly rest.
Greer v. Hatter 364 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Gathright v. Smith 352 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
(1960) places the burden of proof on the party attacking the validity of a marriage.
Eddy v. Eddy 271 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
In his written reasons for judgment filed April 12, 1971, the trial judge found not only had defendant failed to present sufficient evidence of the continued existence of plaintiff’s , (1960), but that in any event the evidence heard by him clearly established both parties were in good faith at the time they consummated the marriage, thus entitling plaintiff to the status of a putative wife and rendering the children legitimate.
Succession of Theriot 185 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
Succession of Choyce 183 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
(1960); Succession of Primus (La.App.
Ellis v. Hayes 168 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
(1960) in which it is stated: “We are in full accord with the majority view that a presumption exist as to the validity of a second marriage and that the burden of proof to show that it is a nullity is on the party attacking it.” [ ] We fully agree with the above statement, however, the
Succession of Davis 142 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
In a comparatively recent case decided by the Supreme Court, , (1960), the Supreme Court remanded the case for further evidence where it had been shown that the wife had abandoned her previous husband, the court holding that it was necessary to establish whether or not she entered into the second marriage in good faith in order to decide whether the burden of proof
Succession of Primus 131 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Louisiana Public Service Commission 128 So. 2d 644 La. 1961
641 , ; , ; Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Louisiana Public Service Commission et al., 240 La.
Illinois Central Railroad v. Louisiana Public Service Commission 125 So. 2d 387 La. 1960