Tendick v. Lastrapes
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., January 25, 1974 289 So. 2d 567; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 23, 1972 258 So. 2d 676; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 2, 1957 95 So. 2d 190; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 6, 1908 5 Teiss. 172
Tendick v. Lastrapes, 28 La. Ann. 76 (1876).
Opinion text
Howell, J. This is an appeal from an order of seizure and sale, on which by the well-settled jurisprudence of this court the only question to be examined is the sufficiency of the evidence on which the judge a •■qtw issued his order. In this case we find ample authentic evidence to warrant the writ, *77 consisting of an act of mortgage in clue form and a note identified therewith. Any other matters of dispute, relating to the validity of the obligation,, the proceeding's following the issuance of the writ, etc., must be raised in another form of action. Judgment affirmed.