Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Darden v. Cox, 123 So. 2d 68.

15 citing documents.

  • Christopher J. Fraino, Sr. v. Malachi S. Hull and Define Your Image, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
    4/17/14), ( So.2d 68, 71 (1960)).
  • Sacco v. Paxton 133 So. 3d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    (1960), the Supreme Court set forth three criteria for establishing an oral commercial partnership agreement: 1) the parties must have mutually consented to form a partnership and to participate in the profits which may accrue from property, skill or industry, furnished to the business in determined
  • Foster v. Blackwell 747 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    (1960); Marshall v. Lambeth, 7 Rob.
  • Harris v. Wallette 538 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • Glover v. Sowada 457 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    The supreme court, , (1960), at page 71, set out the prerequisites for establishing an oral commercial partnership agreement as follows: "The Civil Code and the jurisprudence set out several things which are necessary to a business relationship before it can be considered a partnership as between the parties to it.
  • Butler v. Atwood 420 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
  • Marine Services, Inc. v. A-1 INDUSTRIES 355 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    3d Cir. 1970); , (1960).
  • Dubois v. Reliance Ins. Co. 349 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
  • Ogden v. Ogden 331 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    (1960), rehearing denied (1960), sets out the requirements for a partnership, to-wit: "First, the parties must have mutually consented to form a partnership and to participate in the profits which may accrue from property, skill or industry, furnished to the business in determined proportions by the
  • Bosworth v. Restivo 295 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    between two or more persons for the mutual participation in the profits which *16 may accrue from property, credit, skill or industry, furnished in determined proportions by the parties.” For an explanation of the requirements of partnership contained in the above cited article and those following codal articles relating to general provisions of partnership, , (1960), from which we quote the following at : “[3, 4] The Civil Code and the jurisprudence set out several things which are necessary to
  • Stevens v. Cook & Stevens 245 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
    Our Supreme Court, , 123 So.
  • Sas Jaworsky v. LeBlanc 239 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
    articles 2801, 2805, 2813 and 2814; , (1960); Fiesta Foods, (La.App.
  • In re Dissolution of Commercial Co-partnership Composed of Nelson & Guccione 190 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    692 , ; , ; Crottes v. Frigerio, 18 La.Ann.
  • Fiesta Foods, Inc. v. Ogden 159 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
  • Darden v. Cox 137 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    A , , wherein, on appeal by plaintiff from an adverse judgment of the trial court, the Supreme Court found and decreed that a partnership existed between the parties involved herein.