Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Guillory v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance, 111 So. 2d 314.

35 citing documents.

Ennis v. Plant Service Construction Co. 316 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Griffin v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Company 316 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
(1959) cited by defendants in support of their position is not analogous to the instant case as in Guillory the medical evidence did not disclose an aggravation of a pre-existing arthritic condition.
Tantillo v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. 315 So. 2d 743 La. 1975
App.1st Cir. 1972); Laroux v. Hunt Lumber Company, Inc., , (1959); (La.App.Orl.
Dupre v. Fidelity & Casuality Co. 312 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Chavis v. Maryland Casualty Company 307 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
(1959); Thibodeaux v. Travelers Ins.
Grigsby v. Argonaut Insurance Company 297 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Smith v. Continental Grain Co. 275 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Richard v. Guillot 271 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
2nd Cir. 1955); , (1959); (La.
Square v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 270 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(1959); Laroux v. Hunt Lumber Co., Inc., 209 So.
McGlothen v. Tom Hicks Transfer Co. 262 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
See: , (1959); Richard v. Arthur G. McKee & Company, (La.App.
Smith v. American Motorist Insurance 255 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Sallinger v. Sachse Electric Co. 255 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Krouse v. Parnell, Inc. 248 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Many cases have been cited as authority for this argument, , (1959); Ezell v. Employers Insurance of Wausau (La.App., 2 Cir. 1968), .
Arceneaux v. Danos & Curole Marine Contractors, Inc. 244 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Co., , ; Butler v. American Insurance Company, La.App., .
Cambre v. Hanover Insurance 236 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Thornton v. American Mutual Liability Insurance 216 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
( ; Diggs v. Weitz Company, La.App., ; , ; Lee v. Royal Indemnity Company, La.App., .)
Durham v. G & H Drug Co. 216 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Ezell v. Employers Insurance of Wausau 212 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
“It is the well-settled rule that, where there is no material conflict in the medical evidence, lay testimony will not be considered in a workmen’s compensation case as to an employee’s disability.” , , 318 note 3 (1959).
Pharr V. Insurance Co. of North America 200 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Co., , ; Jones v. Employers Mutual Liability Ins.
Carpenter v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance 178 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Davis v. Clyburn, La.App., .
Diggs v. Weitz Co. 176 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Butler v. American Insurance Company, La.App., ; Powell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., .
Joyner v. LL Brewton Lumber Company 171 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Shuff v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, supra; Butler v. American Insurance Company, La.
Saltalamacchia v. Strachan Shipping Co. 163 So. 2d 548 La. 1964
Co., , ; Tullier v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp., 243 La.
Molden v. Louisiana Agricultural Supply Co. 160 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Co., , ; Powell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., La.App., .
Lee v. Royal Indemnity Company 149 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Davis v. Clyburn, La.App., and Powell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., , inter alia, to the effect that, in the absence of material conflict in the medical testimony, lay evidence may not be considered in determining disability in a suit for workmen's compensat
Porche v. Stone & Webster Engineering Co. 152 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Co., , ; Davis v. Clyburn, La.
Soileau v. Tyl 148 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Costanza v. Crowson Equipment Co. 144 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Co., , , footnote 3, “It is the well-settled rule that, where there is no material conflict in the medical evidence, lay testimony will not be considered in a workmen’s compensation case as to an employee’s disability.” (citing cases) We find no medical testimony based on plaintiff’s correct history, tha
Butler v. American Insurance Company 138 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Note 3, , ; Powell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., La.App., ; Washington v. Swanner, d. b. a. Al's Texaco Service and Employer's Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin, La.App., ; Waldrup v. Consolidated Underwriters, La.App., ; Sellers v. T. J. Moss Tie Co., La.
Bertrand v. Patterson Truck Line 138 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
1 Cir., (affirmed as to disallowance of penalties and attorney's fees, , ); Luce v. New Hotel Monteleone, La.App.Orl., ; Jones v. Employers Mutual Liability Ins.
Cloud v. National Surety Corp. 138 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
23:1221 (1); , ; Malone’s Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Law and Practice, Sec.
Aymonde v. State National Life Insurance Co. 139 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Monk v. American General Insurance 137 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Vidrine v. American Employers Insurance Company 129 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Co., , , cited by the defendant-appellant, the lay evidence was not considered because at issue was the medical question as to whether the plaintiff's disability was permanent or temporary, and because lay testimony could not override expert medical testimony on the medical questions of whether the plaintiff'
Powell v. Travelers Insurance Company 117 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
In support of their aforesaid contention, , .