Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Vail v. Spampinato, 115 So. 2d 343.

16 citing documents.

  • Downey v. Trahan 365 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    (1959), Brantley v. Clarkson, 217 La.
  • Carter v. Salter 351 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
  • Audubon Ins. Co. v. Knoten 325 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
  • Valence v. State 280 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
  • Reliance Insurance Company v. T. DICKENS 279 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    425 , (1950); , (1959) and Demoss v. Summers (La.App.
  • Williams v. Garner 268 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    More recently, , , a wife was involved in an accident while driving a friend to a meeting, the friend having agreed to pay for the transportation provided.
  • Hamm v. Erwin 262 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1972
    Brantley v. Clarkson, 217 La.
  • Vonner v. State ex rel. Department of Public Welfare 258 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    425 , [45] [46] So.2d 614; , ; Bradford v. Brown [La.App.], ; Galle v. Ingraham, [La.App.], .
  • Demoss v. Summers 257 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    (1959), despite contentions to the contrary, the court found the wife was in the habit of using the community car for her own pleasure and concluded the wife had implied permission to make the trip during which the accident occurred.
  • Moreau v. Corley 212 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
    425 , ; , ; McCauley v. LaFleur, La.App., ; Galle v. Ingraham, La.App., .
  • McCauley v. LaFleur 205 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    1st Cir.1952); , (1959) ; Martin v. Brown, 240 La.
  • Vidrine v. General Fire and Casualty Company 168 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    Dowden v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co., La.App.
  • Dowden v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company 151 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    where the wife was driving the family automobile to take a lady friend to a meeting of the Eastern Star Lodge our Supreme Court stated the law as follows: "The law of this State respecting the liability of the husband for the torts of his wife is well expressed in Adams v. Golson, 187 La.
  • Johnson v. Johness 145 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    Galle v. Ingraham, La.App., .
  • Emmco Insurance v. Folse 144 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    (decided November 1959), 12 La.Law Rev. 94.” On the basis of the holding of this Court in the Galle case and of the Supreme Court in Vail v. Spaimpinato, 238 La.
  • Galle v. Ingraham 140 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    (decided November 1959), 12 La.Law Rev. 94.