Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lewing v. De Soto Parish School Board, 113 So. 2d 462.

44 citing documents.

Kasha Lapointe v. Vermilion Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
8 in which a teacher was terminated for tardiness and the supreme court reversed the termination.
Patricia Powell v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Bd., the supreme court stated: Our study of the Teachers’ Tenure Act and the jurisprudence convinces us that the provision in LSA-R.S.
Powell v. Rapides Parish Sch. Bd. 238 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
465 (1959), the supreme court stated: Our study of the Teachers' Tenure Act and the jurisprudence convinces us that the provision in LSA-R.S.
Spears v. BEAUREGARD PARISH SCHOOL BD. 848 So. 2d 540 La. 2003
Wise v. Bossier Parish School Bd. 851 So. 2d 1090 La. 2003
Wise v. Bossier Parish School Bd. 814 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Howard v. W. BATON ROUGE PARISH SCHOOL BD. 793 So. 2d 153 La. 2001
This court has previously reversed the termination of tenured teachers where there is no evidence that the teacher was uncooperative, committed a dereliction of duty, was not warned regarding deficiencies, kept poor records, or failed to discharge her professional duties and responsibilities, , (1959); and where the teacher informed his principal of a needed absence and, although he was not specifically authorized, he was not told he could not take it
Coleman v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 688 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Butler v. IBERVILLE PARISH SCHOOL BD. 648 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Thus in Lewing v. De *461 Soto Parish School Board, , (1959), this Court noted that under the provisions requiring a full hearing at the district court level, a discharged employee of a school board could present additional evidence to that court.
Rubin v. Lafayette Parish School Bd. 649 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Rousselle v. Plaquemines Parish School Bd. 633 So. 2d 1235 La. 1994
Hargis v. LaFourche Parish School Bd. 593 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Gaulden v. Lincoln Parish School Bd. 554 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Thorne v. Monroe City School Bd. 542 So. 2d 490 La. 1989
(1959); Lea v. Orleans Parish School Board, 228 La.
Marcotte v. Avoyelles Parish School Board 512 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Meyers v. Sabine Parish School Bd. 499 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Summers v. Vermilion Parish School Bd. 493 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Wiley v. Richland Parish School Bd. 476 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Phillips v. Plaquemines Parish School Bd. 465 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Cunningham v. Franklin Parish School Bd. 457 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Moffett v. Calcasieu Parish School Board, supra; , (1959); Jennings v. Caddo Parish School Board, supra.
Lewis v. East Feliciana Parish School Bd. 452 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Lewing v. De Soto Parish School Board, supra [ , ]; State ex rel.
In Re Dowden 446 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
[1] , (1959), the board unsuccessfully sought to introduce additional and primary evidence in the district court to support its discipline of a teacher.
In re the Bossier Parish School Board Applying to Perpetuate the Testimony of DOWDEN 446 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
1 , (1959), the board unsuccessfully sought to introduce additional and primary evidence in the district court to support its discipline of a teacher.
Henning v. Carrier 430 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Stevens Concrete Pipe & Products, Inc. v. Burgess, supra; , (1959)."
Landry v. Ascension Parish School Bd. 415 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
The leading case with reference to the procedural requirements in a , (1959), wherein the Court observed: "The Teachers' Tenure Act (LSA-R.S.
State Ex Rel. Franceski v. Plaquemines Parish School Bd. 416 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Delta Bank & Trust Co. v. Lassiter 383 So. 2d 330 La. 1980
Stevens Concrete Pipe & Products, Inc. v. Burgess, supra; , (1959).
Lewis v. East Feliciana Parish Sch. Bd. 372 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
(1959), this Court noted that under the provisions requiring a full hearing at the district court level, a discharged employee of a school board could present additional evidence to that court."
Coburn v. Vernon Parish School Board 364 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Cook v. Natchitoches Parish School Bd. 342 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
WARNING The contention on behalf of Ms. Cook concerning the necessity for a , (1959) where it was held that a school board was arbitrary in discharging a teacher for tardiness without giving a warning and an opportunity to correct the situation.
Howell v. Winn Parish School Board 332 So. 2d 822 La. 1976
(1959), this Court noted that under the provisions requiring a full hearing at the district court level, a discharged employee of a school board could present additional evidence to that court.
Simon v. Jefferson Davis Parish School Board 289 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Celestine v. Lafayette Parish School Board 284 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
1 Cir. 1958); , (1959); State ex rel.
Fleming v. Concordia Parish School Board 275 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
552 (1938); , (1959); Lea v. Orleans Parish School Board, 228 La.
Jennings v. Caddo Parish School Board 276 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
Stewart v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board 251 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
317 , ; Moffett v. Calcasieu Parish, La.App., ; , .
Granderson v. Orleans Parish School Board 216 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
Verret v. Calcasieu Parish School Board 201 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Plaintiff contends that before disciplinary action can be lawfully commenced, as a matter of law he is entitled to advance warning of *387 any deficiencies in his administration as school principal, thus providing him with an opportunity to correct any such inadequacies, , (1959); (La.App.
Hebert v. Police Jury of West Baton Rouge Parish 200 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
720 , (1957); , (1959); Stroy v. Heard [La.
Sciortino v. Louisiana State Board of Cosmetology 194 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Diggs v. Orleans Parish School Board 161 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Johns v. Jefferson Davis Parish School Board 154 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Hebert v. Lafayette Parish School Board 146 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
It has been repeatedly held by the courts of this State that this act should be liberally construed in favor of the class of persons designed to be its primary beneficiaries.” , .
Followed Singleton v. Iberville Parish School Board 136 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
In reviewing the action of the defendant school board, , , that: "`* * * When there is a rational basis for an administrative board's discretionary determinations which are supported by substantial evidence insofar as factually required, the court has no right to substitute its judgment for the administrative board's or to interfere with the latter's bo