Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gaudet v. Economical Super Market, Inc., 112 So. 2d 720.

17 citing documents.

Moretco, Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish Council 112 So. 3d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See, e.g., Gaudet v. Economical Super Mkt., Inc., , -723 (1959) (holding that ordinance allowing the granting of a conditional use permit “will not have an unduly detrimental effect upon the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, ...
Roudakis v. City of Ruston 927 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Gaudet v. Economical Super Market, Inc., , (1959); McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, 231 La.
Bailey v. Parish of Caddo 716 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Specifically Mr. Bailey urges that § 51-242 is flawed because it contains general statements and "platitudes" , (1959).
Foster v. Fowler 652 So. 2d 993 La. 1995
24:175; , (1959); Pollitt v. Connick, 596 F.Supp.
State in Interest of AC 643 So. 2d 719 La. 1994
Succession of Lauga 624 So. 2d 1156 La. 1993
State v. Johnson, id.; , (1959); Pollitt v. Connick, 596 F.Supp.
Kiser v. Parish of Jefferson 498 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
1982) and the prior Supreme Court cases cited therein; i.e., Tiber Petroleum, and Gaudet v. Economical Super Market, Inc., , (1959).
Morton v. Jefferson Parish Council 419 So. 2d 431 La. 1982
1973); Gaudet v. Economical Super Market, Inc., , (1959); McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, 231 La.
City of Baton Rouge v. Short 345 So. 2d 37 La. 1977
Roy v. Edwards, supra ; Gaudet v. Economical Super Market, Inc., , (1959).
Guidry v. Roberts 335 So. 2d 438 La. 1976
Gaudet v. Economical Super Markets, Inc., , (1959); State v. Baggott, 212 La.
Guidry v. Roberts 331 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
the court, quoting with approval from Gaudet v. Economical Supermarket, Inc., , (1959), said: "Of course, it is well established that the unconstitutionality of a portion of a statute (or ordinance) does not necessarily invalidate the whole, particularly where there is a severability clause as here.
Roy v. Edwards 294 So. 2d 507 La. 1974
We stated in Gaudet v. Economical Supermarket, Inc., , (1959): "Of course, it is well established that the unconstitutionality of a portion of a statute (or ordinance) does not necessarily invalidate the whole, particularly where there is a severability clause as here.
Paternostro v. Parish of Jefferson 289 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
This theory is entirely consistent with Gaudet v. Economical Supermarket, Inc., , , and McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, 231 La.
Summerell v. Phillips 282 So. 2d 450 La. 1973
United States Constitution, Amendment V and Amendment XIV, Louisiana Constitution of 1921, Art. I, § 2, Gaudet v. Economical Super Market, Inc., , 112 So.
Fondren v. Morgan City 220 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
36 , (1956), and Gaudet v. Economical Super Market, Inc., , (1959), the Supreme Court of this state discussed the constitutionality of provisions relative to issuing special permits.
Southern Land Title Corp. v. City of New Orleans 156 So. 2d 229 La. 1963
36 , ; Gaudet v. Economical Super Market, Inc., , ; Hunter v. Hussey, La.App., ; Bledsoe v. Erwin, 33 La.Ann.
Sears, Roebuck & Company v. City of Alexandria 155 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
36 , and Gaudet v. Economical Super Market, Inc., , , as well as several cases from other states holding spot zoning ordinances to be illegal under certain circumstances.