Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Barber, 115 So. 2d 864.

20 citing documents.

State, Department of Highways v. Clement 311 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
934 , (1963); State, , (1959); Lafayette Airport Commission v. Roy (supra); State, Department of Highways v. Rapier, 152 * (La.App.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Crow 273 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
1 , (1959); State, , (1959); and State
Lafayette Airport Commission v. Roy 265 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
(1959); Parish of Iberia v. Cook, 238 La.
State, Department of Highways v. Thurman 231 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Crossland 207 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
(1959); State Through Dept. of Highways v. Frells
Recreation & Park Commission for the Parish of East Baton Rouge v. German 202 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Article 1, Section 2 of the Louisiana Constitution provides that, “ * * * [ejxcept as otherwise provided in this Constitution, private property shall not be taken or damaged except for public purposes and after just and adequate compensation is paid.” The Supreme Court of this State, in State Through Dept, of Highways v. Barber (1959) , , said: “[1,2] We reiterate that the general rule is that the measure of compensation to be awarded the owner in expropriation proceedings is the price which wou
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Baddock 160 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
State through Dept. of Highways v. Frellsen, La.App., ; State through Dept. of Highways v. Rooks, La.App., ; State through Dept. of Highways v. Gras, La.App., ; , .
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Poulan 160 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
(1959); State v. Welsh (La.App.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Carmouche 155 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
State through Department of Highways v. O’Neal, (La.App., 3 Cir., 1963), ; State through Department of Highways v. Jenkins, (La.App., 3 Cir., 1963), ; , ; State v. Sauls, 234 La.
Gilbert v. Gravity Drainage District 5 of Calcasieu Parish 154 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
and the cases cited therein.
Orleans Parish School Board v. Dorsett 154 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Cefalu 153 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
(State Through Department of Highways vs. Barber, (1959) ; 238 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. O'Neal 150 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Beatty v. Vining 147 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
988 , ; , ; State Through Department of Highways v. Stoer, 238 La.
Greater Baton Rouge Consol. Sewer Dist. v. Nelson 144 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
718 , ; , ) or the consideration of a land use speculative and conjectural in nature (Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Harang, La.App., 131 So.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Madden 139 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
State of Louisiana, , (1959); State of Louisiana, Through Department of Highways v. Barrow, 238 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Fridge 135 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Ebrecht 135 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Rooks 131 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
In State of Louisiana Through Department of Highways v. Barber, 1959, , -867 , Justice Viosca was faced with similar evidence concerning a cost less depreciation approach.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Stoer 116 So. 2d 498 La. 1959
Accordingly, other methods of proving value were, perforce, resorted to by the litigants.” , , we stated: “Where there have been no sales of similar property in the vicinity of the property sought to be expropriated, other circumstances and factors must be explored in order to discover true value.