Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Henry v. Jean, 115 So. 2d 363.
- Succession of Vincent v. Vincent 527 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-
Succession of Clivens
426 So. 2d 585
La. 1983
Chiefly, they were alerted by the 1959 , (1959).
- Sadler v. King 386 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
- Succession of Washington 308 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
-
Succession of Milton
278 So. 2d 159
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
The Louisiana Supreme Court in passing on the question of whether the amendments would apply to marriages contracted prior to the effective dates of the amendments, affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, , , and in that connection observed: "...., the law affected all persons within the described status whether their parents married and they were acknowledged informally, either before or after its effective date and the legislation cannot *162 be classed as retroactive simp
- Bonvillian v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp. 239 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
-
George v. Bertrand
217 So. 2d 47
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
For instance, , , concerned an interpretation of the legitimation of children by the subsequent marriage of their parents, as provided by Article 198 at issue here.
-
Succession of Barlow
197 So. 2d 682
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
(1959), the effect *684 of the 1944 amendment was applied in a situation, such as the one under consideration, where all the facts were antecedent to the amendment.
- Succession of Simms 175 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
-
Lanier v. TL James & Company
148 So. 2d 100
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Manuel v. Carolina Casualty Ins.
-
Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
136 So. 2d 283
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Manuel v. Carolina Casualty Ins.
- Manuel v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Company 136 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
-
Keller Construction Corp. v. George W. McCoy & Co.
119 So. 2d 450
La. 1960
Since the above cited law is substantive and not remedial, it can have no retroactive effect ( , ).