Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Randall v. Baton Rouge Bus Company, 124 So. 2d 535.

62 citing documents.

  • Fontenot v. Wood 140 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    In Randall v. Baton Rouge Bus Company, (1960), , 124 So.
  • Stewart v. Lowe 140 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
  • Wells v. Causey 137 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    As we observed in the case of Guarisco v. Swindle, La.App., : “ * * * our views are aptly expressed in the concurring opinion of Justice McCaleb in Randall v. Baton Rouge Bus Company, Inc., et al., supra, in which he stated, [ ] 124 So.2d [535] at page 543: ‘A consideration of the facts of this case has not convinced me that the bus operator should or could reasonably have anticipated that the driver of the Randall car would not respect the superior right-of-way of the bus by bringing the car to
  • Dilworth v. Roberts 138 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    338 , ; , ; Andrea v. Hicks, La.App., ; Smith v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, La.App., ; Noonan v. London Guarantee and Accident Company, La.App., ; McCoy v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., ; Warner v. Insurance Company
  • Le Beau v. Baton Rouge Bus Co. 136 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    338 , ; , ; Andrea v. Hicks, La.App., ; Smith v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, La.App., ; Noonan v. London Guarantee and Accident Company, La.App., ; McCoy v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., ; Warner v. Insurance Company
  • Plunkett v. Department of Highways 135 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    338 , ; , ; Rhodes v. Rowell, La.App., 2d Cir., 1958 (writs denied), .
  • Collins v. Purkey 134 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • Benoit v. Vincent 132 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    Youngblood v. Robison, 239 La.
  • Guarisco v. Swindle 132 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Comeaux v. Blanchet, La.App., ; Randall and Mrs. Evelyn L. Randall v. Baton Rouge Bus Company, Inc., and Travelers Insurance Company, , ; Henderson et ux.
  • Noonan v. London Guarantee and Accident Company 128 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    While writs were not applied for in either of the two cases mentioned directly above, we feel they express sound views and are in conformity with the trend of the Supreme Court as expressed by Justice McCaleb when he stated in his concurring opinion in the case of Randall v. Baton Rouge Bus Co., 1960, , 124 So.
  • Smith v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 128 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    Defendants additionally urge the applicability of Randall v. Baton Rouge Bus Co., 1960, , .
  • Pepe v. Tournage 128 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961