Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Landry v. Delas, Lorio & Co., 25 La. Ann. 181.
-
Lone Star Gas Co. v. Winnfield Bottling Works
120 So. 130
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Ann. 384 ; Landry vs. Delas, ); however, defendant offered evidence to show payment, and as such evidence was not admissible under the general denial (Gleises vs. Faurie, 6 La.
-
Smith v. Turner
3 La. App. 91
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Doreino Landry vs. Delas, Lorio & Co., ; Diggs, Hobson & Co. vs. *92 Parish, 18 La.
-
Sabine Lumber Co. v. Trumbull
104 So. 476
La. 1925
I. As a plea of payment is inconsistent with the general issue, and admits the debt unless made good ( ), plaintiff might have rested there.
-
Sabine Lumber Co. v. Trumbull
104 So. 476
La. 1925
y denies that payment thereof has ever been demanded of him, and specially avers that at various times he has requested and demanded of plaintiff that he be furnished with a complete statement of said account, but that plaintiff has refused and neglected to furnish such account.” I. As a plea of payment is inconsistent with the general issue, and admits the debt unless made good ( ), plaintiff might havé rested there.