Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Day v. National US Radiator Corporation, 128 So. 2d 660.
- Daigle v. Cobb 175 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
-
Ewen v. Bloch
173 So. 2d 314
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
When the doctrine is applied, the accident causing the injury makes out a , .
-
Johnson v. Johnson
171 So. 2d 710
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
471 , ; , ; Bodan v. American Employers’ Insurance Company, La.App., .
-
Andrus v. Security Insurance Company of New Haven
161 So. 2d 113
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
1 Cir., , reversed on other grounds, , .
-
Thomas v. Fromherz Engineers
159 So. 2d 612
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
On appeal, , , relied upon by counsel for appellant is inapposite for the following reasons: "* * * The Supreme Court found (1) that the particular contract in the Day case, imposed no duty on the architects to know of, and make an inspection of the installation of the boiler, (2) expert testimony showed the archit
-
Hernandez v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Co.
157 So. 2d 923
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Hoyt v. Amerada Petroleum Corp., La.App., ; Adams v. Great American Indemnity Company, La.App., .
-
Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc.
158 So. 2d 162
La. 1963
(1961): "* * * This doctrine [res ipsa loquitur] is a qualification of the general rule that negligence is not to be presumed but must always be affirmatively proved, and therefore should be sparingly applied, and only in exceptional cases where the demands of justice make that application essential.