DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Derouen v. American Employers Insurance Company, 123 So. 2d 896.

14 citing documents.

  • Kelly Doucet v. Hornet Service Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    48, (1960), which he claims stands for the proposition that, “[i]n no case can a Trial Court find that both defendants exculpated themselves, because it is basic to an application of the rule that one or the other of the parties must have been at fault.” This quotation is not found in Derouen; it comes from Michel v.
  • Michel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 314 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    party must win, when only by a failure to decide this issue may neither party have the merits of his claim decided favorably, and when one party or the other must necessarily prevail if the legal issue is resolved.)" *540 , (1960).
  • Marcantel v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company 219 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
    Rev. 376); , (reversing , 1 Cir., which over dissent failed to apply this principle).
  • Denton v. Fontenot 216 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
  • Ronquille v. American Casualty Co. 204 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
  • Fruge v. Aetna Insurance 194 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    524 , 165 So.2d *102 308 (1964); , (1960); Bryant v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 239 La.
  • Brown v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 177 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    In reversing the trial and appellate courts’ holdings in the Derouen case, at 499 , at 901 , the Supreme Court stated: “Plaintiffs bore their burden of proof, in view of the fact that when they presented their case they called Mrs. Galdwin Derouen and Mrs. Whitney Maturin as witnesses under LSA-R.S.
  • Micheli v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Company 174 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
    Youngblood v. Robison, 239 La.
  • Nelson v. Zurich Insurance 165 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    in which the identical question, that is, which motorist entered an intersection on the green light, was presented for determination.
  • Borskey v. Sayes 154 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Counsel for the defendants also cites Title 11, Section 61 of the Baton Rouge City Code, ,.
  • Washington Fire & Marine Insurance v. Williams 144 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Although the issue was not raised by counsel in their briefs on appeal, we might add that we do not believe the decision in Derouen v. American Employers’ Insurance Company, , , to be applicable to the facts of this case since it is clear that the doctrine of the Derouen *741 case only applies where the drivers of the respective vehicles approaching a controlled intersection fail to seasonably observe the traffic light at a distance sufficiently removed from the intersection
  • Martin v. Broussard 142 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Defendants urge that, at the very least, the defendants’ evidence is of equal weight to that of plaintiff, , .
  • Williamson v. Stephens 140 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Shaw v. Globe Indemnity Company (2d Cir., 1960, writs denied), ; , ; Youngblood v. Robison, 239 La.
  • Collins v. Purkey 134 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Randall v. Baton Rouge Bus Company, 240 La.