Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McGuffy v. Weil, 125 So. 2d 154.

62 citing documents.

Roccaforte v. Lewis 286 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
(1960); Holloway v. Ransome, 216 La.
Fitzwater v. Walker 281 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Clark v. Reed, supra; , (1969).
Armstrong v. Red River, Atchafalaya & Bayou Bouef Levee Board 261 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Art. 753 (Emphasis added.), , (1960).
Wolfe v. North Shreveport Development Co. 228 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
317 , ; , ; and the authorities therein cited.” While as observed in the cited case, the law favors the free and unrestricted use of immovable property, and any doubt in the interpretation of documents dealing therewith is resolved in favor of the land *151 owner, “the real obligation must be clearly apparent fr
Bruce v. Simonson Investments, Inc. 207 So. 2d 360 La. 1968
Holloway v. Ransome, supra; Ouachita Home Site & Realty Co. v. Collie, supra; Goodwin v. Alexander, 105 La.
Whitehall Oil Company v. Heard 197 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
Journet v. Gerard 173 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Burgas v. Stoutz, 174 La.
J. C. Trahan, Drilling Contractor, Inc. v. Younger 169 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
The title contemplated by Article 766 which declares that continuous non-apparent servi-tudes and discontinuous servitudes can be established only by a title, is appropriately characterized by Justice Sanders in McGuffy v. Weil, 1960, , : “The plaintiff attempts to equate ‘title’ as used in the article with the deed, or act of sale, by which the servient estate is acquired.
Emonet v. Tomlinson 163 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Salerno v. DeLucca, 211 La.
Leonard v. Lavigne 162 So. 2d 341 La. 1964
317 , ; , ; and the authorities-therein cited.
Community Builders, Inc. v. Scarborough 149 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Lillard v. Jet Homes, Inc. 129 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
641 , L.R.A.1916B, 1201; , ; Id., La.App.