Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Erath Sugar Company v. Broussard, 125 So. 2d 776.

34 citing documents.

Radcliffe 10, L.L.C. v. Burger 191 So. 3d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
In other words: “Pleading is the ‘handmaid rather than the ihistress’ of justice.” , (1961).
I.F. v. Administrators of the Tulane Education Fund 72 So. 3d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
As has been noted, “Pleading is the ‘handmaid rather than the mistress’ of justice.” Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana v. Louisiana State Employees’ Retirement System, quoting Erath Sugar Company, , (1961); see also La.
Wheat v. Nievar 984 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
quoting Erath Sugar Company, , (1961); see also LSA-C.C.P.
Unwired Telecom v. Parish of Calcasieu 903 So. 2d 392 La. 2005
"Procedure should always be indeed the `handmaiden of justice.'" Id., quoting HEPBURN, THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF CODE PLEADING 19, 20 (1897); , (1961) (holding that under the system of fact pleading prevalent in Louisiana, the procedure relevant to pleading is the "handmaid rather than the mistress" of justice); Ray v. Alexandria Mall, Through St.
Gotro v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 722 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Gotro v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 722 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
An earlier Court stated it well: “Pleading is the ‘handmaid rather than the mistress’ of justice.” , (1961).
Armstead v. Boh Bros. Const. Co., Inc. 609 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Lafayette Parish School Board v. Surrency 583 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Lofaso v. Granger 574 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Klumpp v. XYZ Ins. Co. 547 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Haskins, supra; Pence, supra; Hero, supra; Eschete, supra; , (1961).
Hinds v. Poo-Yie's, Inc. 520 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
art. 865, supra, comment (b); , (1961).
Dier v. Hamilton 501 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Pence v. Ketchum, supra; Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., supra; Eschete v. City of New Orleans, supra; , (1961) ..."
Clingan v. Doughty 491 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. STATE EX REL. DIV. OF ADMIN. 486 So. 2d 95 La. 1986
133 , (1971); Erath Sugar Co. v. Broussard, 240 La.949, (1961).
Teachers'retirement System v. La. St. Employees Retirement System 456 So. 2d 594 La. 1984
Berry v. Bank of Louisiana 439 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Pence v. Ketchum, supra; Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., supra; Eschete v. City of New Orleans, supra; , (1961).
Monies Lumber Co. v. Village Du Lac, Inc. 399 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Haskins v. Clary, supra; Pence v. Ketchum, supra; Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., supra; Eschete v. City of New Orleans, supra; , (1961).
Acadian Heritage Realty, Inc. v. City of Lafayette 394 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Perez 379 So. 2d 1373 La. 1980
Slay v. Smith 368 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
134 , (1971) ; , (1961) .
Haskins v. Clary 346 So. 2d 193 La. 1977
Pence v. Ketchum, supra ; Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., supra; Eschete v. City of New Orleans, supra ; , (1961).
Pence v. Ketchum 326 So. 2d 831 La. 1976
133 , (1971); , (1961); and authorities cited therein.
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc. 310 So. 2d 93 La. 1975
Paxton v. Ballard 289 So. 2d 85 La. 1974
Morgan v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 286 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
and the authorities therein cited.” For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the district court is reversed, defendant’s peremptory exception of no cause and no right of action is overruled, and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the views expressed
Gulotta v. Cutshaw 283 So. 2d 482 La. 1973
In Erath Sugar Company, , , wherein the Court of Appeal had dismissed the plaintiff's suit on its finding that under the (then existing) provisions of the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act (RS 13:4231, 4246) an adequate remedy was available within the framework of our procedural law (this being in reality a petitory action), thi
Griffith v. Roy 269 So. 2d 217 La. 1972
2 ; , , and cases there cited.
Eschete v. City of New Orleans 245 So. 2d 383 La. 1971
and the authorities therein cited.
Eschete v. City of New Orleans 245 So. 2d 383 La. 1971
and the authorities therein cited.
LeSage v. Union Producing Co. 184 So. 2d 727 La. 1966
921 , ; , ; Florida Molasses Co. v. Berger, 220 La.
Succession of Smith 175 So. 2d 269 La. 1965
NOTES [1] , ; Florida Molasses Co. v. Berger, 220 La.
Succession of Ridley 175 So. 2d 269 La. 1965
Florida Molasses Co. v. Berger, 220 La.
Mays v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 159 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Columbia Finance Corporation v. Robitcheck 150 So. 2d 23 La. 1963
and the authorities therein cited.