DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite CHF Finance Company v. Jochum, 127 So. 2d 534.

38 citing documents.

  • Delton Ray Coutee v. Rayland K. Beurlot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    9/15/94), CHF Finance Co., So.2d 534 (La.1961).
  • Coutee v. Beurlot 943 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Waste and Pollution Control Co., 93-3163 (La.9/15/94), ; CHF Finance Co., , (1961).
  • City of Pineville v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE 791 So. 2d 609 La. 2001
    Waste and Pollution Control Co., 93-3163 (La.9/15/94), ; , (1961).
  • In Re Succession of Boyter 756 So. 2d 1122 La. 2000
    Waste and Pollution Control Co., 93-3163 (La.9/15/94), ; CHF Finance Co., , (1961).
  • Sam Fullilove & Associates, Inc. v. Day 639 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • Stanfield v. Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co. 581 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
  • Finkelstein v. Barthelemy 565 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • Sabino v. Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n 426 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    CHF Finance Co. v. Jochum [ ], .
  • Katz & Besthoff, Inc. v. Nauer 391 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    C H F , (1961); King Finance Co. of New Orleans, Inc. v. Howard, supra; DeLatour v. Lala, 15 La.App.
  • Ouachita Parish Sch. Bd. v. Ouachita 362 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
  • King Finance Co. of New Orleans v. Johnson 265 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    C H F , (1961); King Finance Co. of New Orleans, Inc. v. Howard, supra; De Latour v. Lala, 15 La.App.
  • King Finance Co. of New Orleans v. Howard 265 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    211 at page 212 (1930); CHF Finance Company, , (1961); CHF Finance Discount Company
  • State v. Cazes 263 So. 2d 8 La. 1972
    1021 , (1960); C H F , (1961); and Johnson v. Collector of Revenue, 246 La.
  • Finance System of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. Terrell 259 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    Beneficial Finance Company, Inc. v. Gardache, La.App., ; Cash Finance Service No. 3, Inc. v. Rhoden, La.App., ; De Latour v. Lala, 15 La.App.
  • All State Credit Plan, Inc. v. Wilson 254 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    211 at page 212 (1930); CHF Finance Company, , (1961); CHF Finance Discount Company
  • All State Credit Plan Harahan, Inc. v. Anderson 250 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1971
    (1961); (XM.App.2nd Cir. 1969), writ refused Feb.
  • CHF Finance Discount "A" Co. v. Hall 249 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    (1961) and cases cited therein.
  • Friendly Finance Service Mid City, Inc. v. Windham 241 So. 2d 530 La. 1970
  • X-L Finance Co. v. LeDoux 215 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Cir. 1930); C H F Finance Company, , (1961); (La.App.
  • Beneficial Finance Co. v. Cote 216 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    (1961); X-L Finance Co. v. Donaway, La.App., (1st Cir., 1967); Feliciana Finance Co. v. Bateman, La.App., (1st Cir., 1967); General Finance Loan Co. v. Allen, La.App., (2nd Cir., 1964); De Latour v. Lala, 15 La.App.
  • Legros v. Conner 212 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    C H F , (1961); Melancon v. Mizell, 216 La.
  • Beneficial Finance Company of Louisiana v. Lathrop 207 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
    Midland Discount Co. v. Robichaux, La.App., ; General Finance Loan Company, etc. v. Allen, La.App., ; ; Liberal Finance Gentilly, Inc. v. Brister, La.App., ; Earl Staehle Finance, Inc. v. Brooks, La.App., ; , .
  • Liberal Finance Harahan, Inc. v. Majorie 206 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    The situation here is different from that found in C H F , , since there the Court found that the borrower, who failed to list all creditors, had not been told to do so by the lender, but that he had not listed them all because “he could think of only two creditors at the time.” Our conclusion is that the discharge in bankruptcy prevents any action on the note
  • Feliciana Finance Company v. Bateman 194 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    C H F , ; Beneficial Finance Company, Inc. v. Gardache, La.App., ; Cash Finance Service No. 3, Inc. v. Rhoden, La.App., ; De Latour v. Lala, 15 La.App.
  • Dial Finance Company v. Duthu 188 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    See C H F , and Personal Finance Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Murphy, La.App., , which cases were decided prior to the 1960 amendment previously mentioned.
  • Maillet v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TEACHERS'RETIRE. SYS. 183 So. 2d 321 La. 1966
    See, C H F , ; Cf. J. R. Watkins Company v. Floyd, La.App., .
  • Seaboard Finance Corporation v. Stipelcovich 176 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
    C H F , ; Beneficial Finance Company, Inc. v. Gardache, La.App., ; Cash Finance Service No. 3, Inc. v. Rhoden, La.App., ; De Latour v. Lala, 15 La.App.
  • Max Barnett Furniture Co. v. Romano 170 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Finance Company, Incorporated v. Jochum, La.App., and , .
  • Gautreau v. Board of Electrical Examiners 167 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Wilkinson v. Poag, La.App., 181 So.
  • General Finance Loan Co. of Downtown Shreveport v. Allen 165 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Excel Finance Mid City, Inc. v. Chetta, La.App., (4th Cir.1964); C H F Finance Company, , (1961); Excel Finance Mid City, Inc. v. Meilleur, La.App., (4th Cir.1962); Excel Finance Baronne, Inc. v. Abadie, La.App., .
  • Liberal Finance Corporation v. Holley 157 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
    See C H F Finance Company, , ; Personal Finance Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Murphy, La.App., .
  • CHF Finance Company v. Corca 152 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
    C H F Finance Company, , .
  • Liberal Finance Gentilly, Inc. v. Brister 152 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Appellant concedes that to prevail under its alternative contention that defendant's discharge in bankruptcy was barred by defendant's alleged fraud, appellant, , , and other authorities, must establish (1) that defendant made false representations in obtaining the loan; (2) that the false representations made were made with the intention of defrauding plaintiff, and (3) that plaintiff relied upon and was misled by defendant's false representations.
  • Excel Finance Baronne, Inc. v. Dobbs 146 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    In re Noble, D.C., 42 F.Supp.
  • Cash Finance Service No. 3, Inc. v. Rhoden 145 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    We are of the opinion that the more apposite principles of law governing this case may be found in the cases of Morris Finance & Loan, Inc. v. Dickerson, La.App., ; CHF Finance Company, Inc. v. Jochum, La.App., (writs granted and judgment affirmed by the Supreme Court, , , which seems to be the latest expression of the Supreme Court on cases of this category) and Beneficial Finance Company of Louisiana v. Hill, La.App., .
  • Earl Staehle Finance, Inc. v. Brooks 144 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    211 and also in the case of C H F Finance Company, , , our courts have analyzed the foregoing language and stated that before this section would be applicable, "the plaintiff must show: (1) that defendant made false representations; (2) that these representations were made with the intention of defrauding the plaintiff, and (3) that the plaintiff relied
  • Excel Finance Treme, Inc. v. Noel 138 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    In re Noble, D.C., 42 F.Supp.
  • Excel Finance Mid City, Inc. v. Meilleur 137 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    In *505 re Noble, D.C., 42 F.Supp.