Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Randolph v. Village of Turkey Creek, 126 So. 2d 341.

15 citing documents.

Papa v. City of Shreveport 661 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
3d Cir.1983) (Ordinance which, via its method of measurement, extended the prohibition of alcohol sales beyond three hundred feet exceeded the authority granted by the Legislature to parishes and municipalities); , (1961) (Extension beyond three hundred foot zone by local authorities is ultra vires ); Marino v. City of Baton *1108 Rouge, (La.App.
Buy-U-Sak, Inc. v. City of Ruston 602 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Our Supreme Court, , (1961), interpreted a similar ordinance and state statute in this regard.
Hildebrand v. City of New Orleans 549 So. 2d 1218 La. 1989
[8] , (1961) held that legislative intent, illustrated by detailed regulations, may show that the state has preempted a field.
Kneipp v. City of Shreveport 550 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Our Supreme Court, , held that the proper method of measurement under a municipal ordinance which prohibited the issuance of permits for the sale of low content alcoholic beverages for premises within 300 feet of a public playground and certain designated structures and institutions is "from the point nearest th
City of Lake Charles v. Broussard 475 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
413 , (1968); , (1961); National Food Stores of Louisiana
Superstop, Inc. v. Town of Winnsboro 467 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
The issue of whether the word “premises” for purposes of a beer permit means *1227 , (1961), wherein the court stated: It is not necessarily true that the property line of the lot on which the building, structure, or area selling alcoholic beverages is the location whose proximity is in question; rather, it is the building or structure where the alcoholic beverage is sold which is the
Little Giant Food Stores, Inc. v. STATE, ETC. 416 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
The appellee contends that the starting points for measuring the distance to the *130 plaintiff's premises are the church playground and parking lot, , (1961).
Cities Service Co. v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety 381 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
(1961) is cited by defendant-appellant as authority that the Supreme Court interpreted “premises” to mean building and not the entrance.
National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc. v. Cefalu 280 So. 2d 903 La. 1973
413 , (1968); , (1961); City of Minden v. David Brothers Drug Co., 195 La.
Pratt v. Livingston Parish Police Jury 278 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
112 Grocery v. Cappel 228 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Lentini v. City of Kenner 211 So. 2d 311 La. 1968
Johnson v. Police Jury of Ouachita Parish 180 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
the Supreme Court declared that a police jury may not, under the authority of a local option election, prohibit the sale of alcoholic beverages containing no more than 3.2% of alcohol by volume.
Food Town, Inc. v. Town of Plaquemine 174 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
provides that in measuring the distance from the church or school etc., the point of beginning shall be made from the point nearest the sidewalk, or its outer boundary or property line, in which the usual and ordinary activities incident to such an institution are carried on and proceed by the sidewa
Michell v. Louisiana State Board of Optometry Exam. 128 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961