Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Olivier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 131 So. 2d 50.
-
Rachal v. Highlands Ins. Co.
355 So. 2d 1355
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
37 , (1969); , (1961); Hughes v. Enloe, 214 La.
-
Phillips v. Dresser Engineering Co.
351 So. 2d 304
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
See also Oliver [Olivier] v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., , 131 So.2d.
-
Lucas v. Ins. Co. of North America
342 So. 2d 591
La. 1977
Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, La., (1973); , (1961); Brannon v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins.
- Lewis v. St. Charles Parish Hospital District 323 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
-
Bryant v. Travelers Insurance Co.
314 So. 2d 379
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Co., , (1961); Malone, Louisana Workmen’s Compensation Law and Practice, § 275 (1951).
- Jordan v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY 295 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
-
Charleston v. Veri-Fresh Poultry Company, Inc.
273 So. 2d 712
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
(1961), that court announced certain principles particularly applicable to the case at bar, in these terms: "The term `work of any reasonable character' found in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 of R.S.
- Ventress v. Danel-Ryder, Inc. 225 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
-
Lawless v. Steel Erectors, Inc.
222 So. 2d 849
La. 1969
This rule is applicable to a skilled worker who cannot perform a substantial portion of the work incident to his special occupation.” , (1961) and Brannon v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance Co., 224 La.
-
Jarrell v. Maryland Casualty Co.
200 So. 2d 332
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Co., , ; Blanchard v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co., La.App., ; Lathers v. Schuylkill Products Co. Inc., La.App., ; Malone, Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Law and Practice, sec.
- Haynes v. Atlas Construction Co. 199 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
-
Funderburk v. Southwestern Iron Corp.
180 So. 2d 4
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Co., , ; Blanchard v. Pittsburg-Des Moines Steel Co., La.
-
Smith v. Travelers Insurance Company
174 So. 2d 241
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Co., , ; Brannon v. Jurich General Accident and Liability Insurance Co., 224 La.
-
Kemp v. L. L. Brewton Lumber Co.
168 So. 2d 911
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
538 , (1948); , ; Glidden v. Alexandria Concrete Company, 242 La.
-
Rawls v. Dixie Drilling Co.
161 So. 2d 417
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Glidden v. Alexandria Concrete Company, 242 La.
-
Ball v. American Marine Corporation
159 So. 2d 138
La. 1963
Co., , ; Blanchard v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co., La.App., ; Lathers v. Schuylkill Products Co., Inc., La.App., ; Malone, Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Law and Practice, sec.
-
Thomas v. Gates, Inc.
157 So. 2d 263
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Anderson v. Rowan Drilling Company, La.App.
- James v. Acme Window Cleaners 154 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
- Anderson v. Rowan Drilling Company 150 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
-
Robinson v. Travelers Insurance Co.
150 So. 2d 98
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
The jurisprudence seems clear that a workman is totally disabled by reason of a chronic skin disease when he is a skilled laborer and because of his chronic skin allergy he is unable to perform his specialized trade or skill, , , which also holds that, once the reaction clears, a common laborer is not considered permanently disabled even though further contact with the irritant will produce a rash, because any disability he had was a pre-existing one and the employer is only required to restore
-
Comoletti v. Ideal Cement Company
147 So. 2d 711
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Able counsel for plaintiff strenuously urges that plaintiff should be awarded compensation for total permanent disability under the rule established by Blanchard v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co., La.App., ; Lathers v. Schuylkill Products Co., La.App., , , , namely, that where a common laborer sustains injury seriously handicapping him from competing with others in the common labor market, he is considered totally and permanently disabled.
-
Lindsey v. Continental Casualty Company
138 So. 2d 543
La. 1962
Brannon v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins.
-
Glidden v. Alexandria Concrete Company
137 So. 2d 894
La. 1962
The initial point for decision here, , , is whether the operation of a cementmixer truck is a special skill or trade of such a nature that the loss of the ability to perform it constitutes total and permanent disability under the doctrine enunciated in Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., 208 La.
-
Glidden v. Alexandria Concrete Co.
137 So. 2d 894
La. 1962
The initial point for decision here, , , is whether the operation of a cement-mixer truck is a special skill or trade of such a nature that the loss of the ability to perform it constitutes total and permanent disability under the doctrine enunciated in Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., 208 La.