Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Li Rocchi v. Keen, 134 So. 2d 893.

16 citing documents.

Reynolds v. Succession of Williams 628 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
(1961); Mills’ Succession v. Manasseh, 147 So.
First Guar. Bk. v. Baton Rouge Petroleum Center, Inc. 529 So. 2d 834 La. 1988
Colonial Bank v. Marina Seafood Market, Inc. 425 So. 2d 722 La. 1983
Am. Eagle, Inc. v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSUR. CORP. 389 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Franklin v. BRIDGES LOAN & INVESTMENT CO., INC. 371 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
7:9; , (1961); Mente & Co. v. Levy, 160 La.
Cameron Brown South, Inc. v. East Glen Oaks, Inc. 341 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
American Bank & Trust Co. v. Carson Homes, Inc. 316 So. 2d 732 La. 1975
Reed v. Meaux 292 So. 2d 557 La. 1974
Thrift Funds Canal, Inc. v. Foy 260 So. 2d 628 La. 1972
7:9; , (1961); Mente & Co. v. Levy, 160 La.
First National Bank of Lafayette v. Gaddis 250 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
(1961), involved a foreclosure by executory process on three mortgage notes made payable to the order of "Ourselves" and endorsed in blank by the makers and mortgagors.
Powell v. Carter 233 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
League Central Credit Union v. Montgomery 207 So. 2d 762 La. 1968
XL Finance Company v. Fenske 197 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Article 2164 render any judgment which is just and proper upon the record on appeal; (2) Plaintiff having established the discharge in bankruptcy of the claim sued upon has, , , proved evidence which cost plaintiff his claim; and (3) The judicial declaration of plaintiff regarding the bankruptcy discharge obtained by appellants is binding upon plaintiff.
Bickham Motors, Inc. v. Crain 185 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Keen v. Lirocchi 153 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Finn v. Uddo 135 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
However, the Supreme Court, , granted remedial writs .and on Monday, November 6, 1961, reversed the decision of the First Circuit Court and held that since, in the act, it was stated that the notes were made payable to the “order of Ourselves”, and since it was also stated that the notes were delivered to the “mortgagees .as owners thereof