Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Moak v. American Automobile Insurance Company, 134 So. 2d 911.

79 citing documents.

Watkins v. Johns-Manville Corp. 458 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Art. 3079, , (1961); (La.
Higgins v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCES 451 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
art. 3079; , (1961); (La.
Condoll v. Johns-Manville Sale Corp. 448 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Art. 3079, , (1961); (La.App.
Smith v. Leger 439 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
art. 3079; , (1961); (La.App.
Thompson v. BANK OF NEW ORLEANS, ETC. 422 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Cooperider v. Dearth 420 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Co., , (1961), and Mooneyhan v. State Farm Mut.
Munna v. Mangano 404 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Henderson v. Stansbury 372 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Herman J. Downey & Sons, Inc. v. Louisiana Oil & Refining Co. 344 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Honeycutt v. Town of Boyce 327 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Matthew v. Melton Truck Lines, Inc. 310 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Machost v. Brown 298 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Mooneyhan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 290 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
Webb v. Sonnier 272 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Trask v. Lewis 258 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Sanford v. Richardson 252 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Volkswagen Insurance Co. v. Bishop 231 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
(1961).” To substantiate the Hatchers’ defense, that they did not intend to compromise or release so much of the claim as had been acquired by Volkswagen by subrogation, *468 the testimony of the attorney who negotiated the settlement and prepared the release for the Hatchers to sign, was admitted.
Wilson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 228 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Cleveland v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. 222 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
728 , 730] Cited to support plaintiff’s , (1961); Wise v. Prescott, 244 La.
Great American Insurance v. Davis 217 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Hence, parol testimony was admissible to show the intention of the parties, , (1961).
LeBlanc v. Brou 205 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Bielkiewicz v. Rudisill 201 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
Harris v. Stockman 197 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
Co., , , is particularly appropriate.
American Metal Window Co. v. St. Tammany Parish School Board 183 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Our law on the subject is set forth in Louisiana Civil Code Article 3073 , , and Wise v. Prescott, 244 La.
Wyatt v. Maryland Casualty Co. 160 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Bowden v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 150 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Bain v. Judice 149 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Moak v. Ameri *718 can Automobile Insurance Company, , .
Long v. Globe Indemnity Co. 144 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Plaintiffs’ counsel in brief states that the exception of res judicata was presented prior to the recent decisions in Hornsby v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Hartford, Conn., La.App., , , , decided by the Supreme Court, and that at the time the latest expression of our Courts was Blades v. Southern Farm Bureau, La.
Darensbourg v. Columbia Casualty Company 140 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Those cases are: , ; McDaniel v. Audubon Insurance Company, La.App., ; and Succession of Aymond, 202 La.