Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Elliott v. Dupuy, 135 So. 2d 54.

72 citing documents.

Janet Stewart Versus Charlotte Miller, Clayton Miller & Faith Hatcher Hooter La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
927, 931; So.2d 54 (1961); (La.
Charia v. Hulse 619 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
A subsequent case, , (1961) used the same language, i.e. "annexed documents", when considering contracts of sale annexed to the petition.
Gorman v. Swaggart 524 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Clingan v. Doughty 491 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
121 , (1964); , (1961); United Mine Workers v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co., 238 La.
Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. STATE EX REL. DIV. OF ADMIN. 486 So. 2d 95 La. 1986
530 , (1971); Burns v. Genovese, 254 La.237, (1969); Little v. Haik, 246 La.121, (1964); Elliot v. Dupuy, 242 La.173, (1961); United Mine Workers v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co., 238 La.
Cashio v. Shoriak 481 So. 2d 1013 La. 1986
Terrebonne Bank & Trust Co. v. Lacombe 464 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc. 444 So. 2d 618 La. 1984
art. 927; Elliott v. Dupuy , Johnson v. Edmonston (La.App.
Musso v. Aiavolasiti 439 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Batson v. Cherokee Beach & Campgrounds, Inc. 428 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
(1961); Bamber Contractors, Inc. v. Henderson Bros., Inc., (La.App.
Thomas v. Kenton 425 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Miller v. McDonald's Corp. 415 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
237 , (1969); , (1961); Harwood Oil & Mining Co. v. Black, 240 La.
Commissioner of Agriculture v. Fontenot 412 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Veazey v. WT Burton Industries, Inc. 407 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Acadian Heritage Realty, Inc. v. City of Lafayette 394 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
121 , (1964); , (1961); United Mine Workers v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co., 238 La.
Hagood v. Pickering 385 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Johnson v. Edmonston 383 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Perez 379 So. 2d 1373 La. 1980
121 , (1964); , (1961);.
Godwin v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Bd. 372 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Slay v. Smith 368 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
121 , (1964) ; , (1961) ; United Mine Workers v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co., 238 La.
Associated Executive Control, Inc. v. Bankers Union Life Insurance 367 So. 2d 811 La. 1979
State Ex Rel. Guste v. City of New Orleans 363 So. 2d 678 La. 1978
Tano Corp. v. LA. HEALTH SERVICE & INDEM. CO. 355 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
121 , (1964); , (1961); and United Mine Workers v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co., 238 La.
Kilson v. American Road Insurance 345 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Sifers v. Exxon Corp. 338 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
121 , (1964); , (1961); United Mine Workers v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co., 238 La.
Pence v. Ketchum 326 So. 2d 831 La. 1976
Eschete v. City of New Orleans, supra; , (1961).
Stevens v. Bd. of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of City of Shreveport 309 So. 2d 144 La. 1975
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc. 310 So. 2d 93 La. 1975
121 , (1964); , (1961); United Mine Workers v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co., 238 La.
Gruenberg v. Goldmine Plantation, Inc. 304 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
United Companies Mortgage & Investment of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Brown 303 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
(1961); Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company v. Goslin, 258 La.
Contranchis v. Parish of Jefferson 299 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Williamson Marine Transport, Inc. v. Louisiana Tax Commission 293 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Barnett v. Develle 289 So. 2d 129 La. 1974
Continental Nut Co. v. Louisiana Pecan Shelling Co. 279 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Johnson v. Schneider 271 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Jarreau v. Jarreau 268 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Finkel v. Texas-Edwards, Inc. 267 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
In passing upon an exception of no cause of action, , : “It is well settled that an exception of no cause of action addresses itself to the sufficiency in law of the petition and is triable on the face of the papers ; that for the purpose of determining the issues raised by this exception, the well pleaded facts in the petition and any annexed documents mu
Escat v. National Bank of Commerce in New Orleans 256 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
art. 927 (4); , (1961); (La.App.
Pete v. Estate of Pete 253 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Succession of Lambright v. Lambright 252 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
2d 700 , rehearing refused, La.App., ; , .
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Louisiana Tax Commission 251 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Saragusa v. Dipaola 247 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company v. Goslin 246 So. 2d 852 La. 1971
108 , ; , ; Little v. Haik, 246 La.
Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co. v. Goslin 246 So. 2d 852 La. 1971
108 , ; , ; Little v. Haik, 246 La.
Eschete v. City of New Orleans 245 So. 2d 383 La. 1971
Eschete v. City of New Orleans 245 So. 2d 383 La. 1971
Patrick v. Patrick 241 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Francois v. Fireman's Fund Insurance 236 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
(1961) and authorities cited therein.
Moore v. Shell Oil Company 228 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
Thaxton v. Roberson 224 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969