DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Airco Refrigeration Service, Inc. v. Fink, 134 So. 2d 880.

74 citing documents.

  • Master Maintenance Engineering, Inc. v. McManus 292 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961).
  • Congregation Gates of Prayer v. DiMaggio 286 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    See Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961).
  • Scott Fence & Insulation Co. v. Boudro 252 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Franklin v. Mackie 221 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961).
  • Haller v. Sargent 219 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Aireo Refrigeration Service, Inc. v. Fink, La.App., , affirmed , ; A. A. Home Improvement Company, Inc. v. Irwin, La.App., .
  • Cannon v. Van Valin 211 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); (La.App.
  • Bramlette v. Hebert 210 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Article 2769; Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961).
  • Houlemard v. Brierre 207 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    See Airco Refigeration Service, , ; Rocquin v. Simmons, La.App., .
  • AA Home Improvement Company v. Irwin 203 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); (La.App.
  • U-Finish Homes, Inc. v. Lanzl 202 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    art. 2769 which reads as follows: “If an undertaker fails to do the work he has contracted to do, or if he does not execute it in the manner and at the time he has agreed to do it, he shall he liable in damages for the losses that may ensue from his noncompliance with his contract.” In the case of Aireo Refrigeration Service, , , on page 882, the Supreme Court of Louisiana stated: “[1,2] The contract involved in the instant case is a building contract within the definition of Article 2756 of the
  • Jim Walter Corporation v. Laperouse 196 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    Assuming for purposes of discussion that some defects directly attributable to the builder are proven by the record, the legal principle to be applied in determining contractual liability of the parties is found in Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961): "The contract involved in the instant case is a building contract within the definition of Article 2756 of the LSA-Civil Code.
  • Sullivan v. Carpenter 193 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    See Airco Refrigeration Service Inc. v. Fink [ ], .
  • Graham v. Lieber 191 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); , La.App., 4th Cir.1961; , La.App., Orl.1945; Merrill v. Harang, 198 So.
  • Rocquin v. Simmons 187 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    We think the legal principle to be applied in determining the contractual liability in this case is found in Airco Refrigeration Serv., -81 , (1961): “The contract involved in the instant case is a building contract within the definition of Article 2756 of the LSA-Civil Code.
  • Rathe v. Maher 184 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    386 ; Polizzi v. Thibodeaux (1948), La.App., ; Montague v. Milan (1953), La.App., ; Airco Refrigeration Service, Inc. v. Fink (1961) , ; Federico v. Kratzberg (1964), La.App., .
  • Breaux v. Co-Operative Cold Storage Builders, Inc. 187 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , .
  • Snow-White Roofs, Inc. v. Boucher 182 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , ; Federico v. Kratzberg, La.App., ; D'Antonio v. Lemoine, La.
  • U-Finish Homes, Inc. v. Michel 183 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    If an undertaker fails to do the work he has contracted to do, or if he does not execute it in the manner and at the time he has agreed to do it, he shall be liable in damages for the losses that may ensue from his noncompliance with his contract.” In the case of Airco Refrigeration Service, Inc. v. Fink (1961) , , the Supreme Court said on page 79 of 242 La.
  • Bayone v. Petteway 180 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); Town & Country Contractors v. Henderson, 231 La.
  • Rogers v. Standard Plumbing & Heating Co. 176 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
  • Federico v. Kratzberg 163 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
    D'Antonio v. Lemoine, La.App., ; Airco Refrigeration Service, , ; Loeb v. Neilson, La.App., ; Norman v. Brown, La.App., ; DuBos v. Sanders, 174 La.
  • Southern Patio, Inc. v. Brown 153 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    D’Antonio v. Lemoine, La.App., ; Airco Refrigeration Service, , ; Norman v. Brown, La.App., .
  • Brown v. Sanders 149 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Airco Refrigeration Service,, , (1961).
  • Edward Chassaniol, Jr., Roofing & Siding, Inc. v. Ramsey 144 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    In the light of the above determinations, we believe the principles applicable to the facts of this case were succinctly stated by our Supreme Court in the recent case of Airco Refrigeration Service, , , in which the court adopted with approval the following passage extracted from the appeals court decision in that case, to-wit: “With reference to the performance vel non of building contracts, where the contractor has defaulted, either in not completing the work or having performed defective wor