Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wischer v. Madison Realty Company, 136 So. 2d 62.

29 citing documents.

State v. Brooks 124 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Saxon 500 So. 2d 379 La. 1987
706 , (1962); , (1962) and Kendrick v. Garrene, 231 La.
State v. Martin 487 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
(1961); Britt v. Merritt, 219 La.
LaCroix v. Travelers Indem. Co. 333 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
Thibodeaux v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co. 310 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
State ex rel. Matranga v. Hunt 302 So. 2d 620 La. 1974
Lauland v. Trauth 302 So. 2d 624 La. 1974
Shreveport Wholesale Credit Men's Ass'n v. Seaburg 300 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
We have held this expressly, in the following language: ‘* * * Any action of the trial court upon an application for an extension filed after the last extended return date is without legal effect * * , .
State v. Kraft 294 So. 2d 219 La. 1974
Howard v. Hardware Mutual Company 286 So. 2d 334 La. 1973
702 , (1964); , (1961); Richardson v. Richardson, La.
State v. Smith 284 So. 2d 576 La. 1973
State v. Price 274 So. 2d 194 La. 1973
579 , (1970), , (1961), which recognized that a district court loses jurisdiction to extend a return date after the expiration of the return date last set.
In re Investigation of Possible Violation of the Civil Service Law & Rules by Roberts 257 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Gremillion v. Rinaudo 240 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
702 , , , as authority for its holding.
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Lasseigne 232 So. 2d 278 La. 1970
We have held this expressly, in the following language: “ * * * Any action of the trial court upon an application for an extension filed after the last extended return date is without legal effect * , .
Favrot v. Favrot 210 So. 2d 316 La. 1968
Stoltz v. McConnell 202 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Desselle v. Petrossi 203 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
See also Wischer v. Madison Realty Company, Inc., , (1961).
Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Dixie Electric Membership Corp. 179 So. 2d 637 La. 1965
411 , ), and of the recognized doctrine that “an appeal should not be dismissed except for the substantial causes provided by law” (Wischer v. Madison Realty Company, Inc., , ), we must and do hold that the appeal taken by this plaintiff was improperly dismissed by the Court of Appeal.
McMillen Feeder Finance Corporation v. Thompson 171 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
and Portier v. Marquette Casualty Co., La.App.
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Deep South Pest Control, Inc. 173 So. 2d 190 La. 1965
General Motors Accept. Corp. v. Deep South Pest Con. 173 So. 2d 190 La. 1965
Revere v. Wiregrass Gas & Appliance Co. 169 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
State Through Dept. of Highways v. Cefalu, La.App., .
Vehrs v. Jefferson Insurance Co. 166 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
Nunez v. Serpas, 198 La.
Clark v. Richardson 157 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Nunez v. Serpas, 198 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Cefalu 146 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Wischer v. Madison Realty Co. 146 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Gauthier v. Williams 146 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
and Jackson and Allen v. Dupont, Incorporated, La.App., 140 So.
Jackson v. Dupont, Incorporated 140 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
in support of the rule that appeals are favored in the law particularly in the statutory reform of recent years which is intended to eliminate the dismissal of appeals on technical grounds.