DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co., 137 So. 2d 298.

561 citing documents.

  • Motors Insurance v. Charpio 151 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1963
  • Audubon Insurance Co. v. National Surety Corp. 150 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    and Borne v. Clay, La.App., .
  • Vosbein v. Arras 149 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Alvares v. Rush, La.App., .
  • Bertrand v. Trunkline Gas Company 149 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    (1962) where, in a similar factual situation, our Supreme Court rejected the doctrine of "passive negligence", as placing "undue emphasis on the chronology of the negligent acts and omissions."
  • Perkins v. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Company 147 So. 2d 646 La. 1962
    v. American Beverage Co., , ; Leonard v. Holmes & Barnes, Limited, 232 La.
  • Moses v. Mosley 146 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    Dixie Drive It Yourself System, , (1962); Maggiore v. Laundry & Dry Cleaning Service, Inc., La.App.
  • Clingman v. Millerville Mud Sales, Inc. 146 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Learned counsel for plaintiff argues that the recent Supreme Court decision, Dixie Drive It Yourself System, New Orleans Company, , , is controlling under the facts of the case at bar and that under the holding of that case the plaintiff should be allowed recovery.
  • Larned v. Wallace 146 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    This contention must fall in view of the recent *439 , , in which our Supreme Court has rejected the doctrine of "passive negligence" as placing undue emphasis on the chronology of the negligent acts complained of.
  • Norton v. Argonaut Insurance Company 144 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    In the most recent pronouncement on the subject matter, , , the rule is stated as follows: "The inquiry as to whether a defendant should be relieved of liability because of the intervening negligence of another is frequently couched in terms of proximate cause.
  • Levert v. Travelers Indemnity Company 140 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co., La., .
  • Steagall v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 138 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962