Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Co. v. Russell, 142 So. 2d 391.
-
STATE FARM MUT. AUTHO. INS. CO. v. Casualty Reciprocal Exch.
600 So. 2d 106
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
See Touchet, cited by the majority, , (1962).
-
Puckett v. State Farm Ins. Co.
526 So. 2d 490
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
In yet another case, , (1962), the Supreme Court found that the failure by the insured to list a second car (the one being driven at the time of the accident) in *493 the declarations of the policy did not defeat coverage because the car nevertheless met the definition of an "owned" automobile.
-
Benton Casing Service, Inc. v. Avemco Ins. Co.
379 So. 2d 225
La. 1979
(1962), it was contended that because a second automobile owned by the named insured was not described in the declarations page which had an entry blank for a second automobile and that because no entries were made in the premium column on the declarations page showing that a premium was payable on a s
-
Andrus v. Police Jury of Parish of Lafayette
270 So. 2d 280
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
522 , (1953); , (1962); (La.App.
- Murry v. Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance Company 198 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
-
Taylor v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
185 So. 2d 41
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
*43 The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company was made a primary defendant and also a third-party defendant herein apparently on the basis of the Supreme Court’s , .
-
Gage v. Roy
173 So. 2d 885
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
1st Cir. 1959); , (1962); (La.App.
-
Green v. American Home Assurance Company
169 So. 2d 213
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
Lejeune v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
-
Anderson v. Fontenot
163 So. 2d 366
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
Pel-State Oil Company v. Weimer, (La.
-
Wischan v. Brockhaus
163 So. 2d 572
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
1901,1945; , ; Rogillio et al. v. Cazedessus, Individually, et al., 241 La.
- Chalmette Finance Corp. v. All American Assurance Co. 158 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
-
Casano v. Cook
157 So. 2d 616
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
’ The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Indiana Lumber *619 , , held that coverage is afforded to all owned cars unless the special endorsement is included in the policy.
- Pel-State Oil Co. v. Weimer 156 So. 2d 603 La. 1963
-
Pel-State Oil Co. v. Weimer
155 So. 2d 218
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
The policy issued by Granite State Insurance Company to Robert E. Weimer as the insured is of the type known as a family combination automobile policy and its provisions are identical with those which were considered by the Supreme Court in Indiana Lumbermen’s , .