Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Co. v. Russell, 142 So. 2d 391.

14 citing documents.

  • STATE FARM MUT. AUTHO. INS. CO. v. Casualty Reciprocal Exch. 600 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    See Touchet, cited by the majority, , (1962).
  • Puckett v. State Farm Ins. Co. 526 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    In yet another case, , (1962), the Supreme Court found that the failure by the insured to list a second car (the one being driven at the time of the accident) in *493 the declarations of the policy did not defeat coverage because the car nevertheless met the definition of an "owned" automobile.
  • Benton Casing Service, Inc. v. Avemco Ins. Co. 379 So. 2d 225 La. 1979
    (1962), it was contended that because a second automobile owned by the named insured was not described in the declarations page which had an entry blank for a second automobile and that because no entries were made in the premium column on the declarations page showing that a premium was payable on a s
  • Andrus v. Police Jury of Parish of Lafayette 270 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
    522 , (1953); , (1962); (La.App.
  • Murry v. Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance Company 198 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
  • Taylor v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 185 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    *43 The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company was made a primary defendant and also a third-party defendant herein apparently on the basis of the Supreme Court’s , .
  • Gage v. Roy 173 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    1st Cir. 1959); , (1962); (La.App.
  • Green v. American Home Assurance Company 169 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
    Lejeune v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
  • Anderson v. Fontenot 163 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    Pel-State Oil Company v. Weimer, (La.
  • Wischan v. Brockhaus 163 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    1901,1945; , ; Rogillio et al. v. Cazedessus, Individually, et al., 241 La.
  • Chalmette Finance Corp. v. All American Assurance Co. 158 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
  • Casano v. Cook 157 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    ’ The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Indiana Lumber *619 , , held that coverage is afforded to all owned cars unless the special endorsement is included in the policy.
  • Pel-State Oil Co. v. Weimer 156 So. 2d 603 La. 1963
  • Pel-State Oil Co. v. Weimer 155 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    The policy issued by Granite State Insurance Company to Robert E. Weimer as the insured is of the type known as a family combination automobile policy and its provisions are identical with those which were considered by the Supreme Court in Indiana Lumbermen’s , .