Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Perkins v. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Company, 147 So. 2d 646.

60 citing documents.

Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. Florane 173 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
569 , ; Perkins v. Texas & N. O. Railway Co., , .
Ewen v. Bloch 173 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Castille v. Cormier, 144 La.
Brown v. Travelers Insurance 171 So. 2d 478 La. 1965
Johnson v. Johnson 171 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Company, 242 La.
Allen v. Honeycutt 171 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Perkins v. Texas *776 and New Orleans Railroad Company, , (1962).
Lee v. Carwile 168 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
Perkins v. Texas & N. O. Railway Co., , ; Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co., cited above.
Town of Slidell v. Temple 164 So. 2d 276 La. 1964
569 , (1963) ; , (1962).
Wheat v. New Orleans and Northeastern Railroad Co. 163 So. 2d 65 La. 1964
Hebert v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance 161 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Or again, as the Supreme Court recently stated in Perkins v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company, , , “Recognizing that the fact of causation is not susceptible of proof to a mathematical certainty, the law requires only that the evidence show that it is more probable than not that the harm was caused by the tortious conduct of the defendant.” As to the majority’s holding that the five-year-old boy m
Naquin v. Marquette Casualty Company 153 So. 2d 395 La. 1963
In the recent case of Perkins v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company, , , we stated: “Recognizing that the fact of causation is not susceptible of proof to a mathematical certainty, the law requires only that the evidence show that it was more probable than not that the harm was caused by the tortious conduct of the defendant.” 3 Causation may, of course, be proved by circ