DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Allen v. Commercial National Bank in Shreveport, 147 So. 2d 865.

42 citing documents.

  • Ebony Williams v. Louis J. Perret, Lafayette Clerk of Court La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    Bank, [ So.2d 865, 868 (1962),] “[n]o principle of law has received greater and more frequent sanction, or is more deeply imbedded in our jurisprudence, than that which forbids a collateral attack on a judgment or order of a competent tribunal, not void on its face ab initio.” With this in mind, i
  • Bell Family Trust v. Vermilion Parish Clerk of Court La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    840, (1962),] “[n]o principle of law has received greater and more frequent sanction, or is more deeply imbedded in our jurisprudence, than that which forbids a collateral attack on a judgment or order of a competent tribunal, not void on its face ab initio.” With this in mind, in Price v. Pric
  • Park Place Surgery Ctr., LLC v. Nat'l Oilwell Varco, L.P. 250 So. 3d 1087 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    1 Cir. 12/2/05) ; , 5, quoting Allen v. Commercial Nat'l Bank , , , 868 (La.1962).
  • Park Place Surgery Center D/B/A Park Place Surgical Hospital (Brian Armstead) v. National Oilwell Varco, Lp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    1 Cir. 12/2/05); quoting Allen v. Commercial Nat’l Bank, So.2d 865, 868 (La.1962).
  • Allstate Insurance Co. v. Daniel 177 So. 3d 169 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
  • Allstate Insurance Co. v. Daniel 178 So. 3d 610 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
  • Driscoll v. Mazaleski 95 So. 3d 1140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Bank, , (1962), the Supreme Court stated: “No principle of law has received greater and more frequent sanction, or is more deeply imbedded in our jurisprudence, than that which forbids a collateral attack on a judgment or order of a competent tribunal, not void on its face ab initio."
  • Parish of Iberville Sales Tax Department v. City of St. Gabriel 21 So. 3d 955 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Lowman v. Merrick 960 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Bank, , (1962), "No principle of law has received greater and more frequent sanction, or is more deeply imbedded in our jurisprudence, than that which forbids a collateral attack on a judgment or order of a competent tribunal, not void on its face ab initio."
  • Salles v. Salles 928 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Bank, , (1962), "No principle of law has received greater and more frequent sanction, or is more deeply imbedded in our jurisprudence, than that which forbids a collateral attack on a judgment or order of a competent tribunal, not void on its face ab initio."
  • Edwards v. Edwards 755 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
  • Draper v. Draper 554 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • O'Neill v. Sumrall 481 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    2001-2006; , (1962); In re Phoenix Building & Homestead Assn., 203 La.
  • Lemalle v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 452 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • Tuttle v. Tuttle 430 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    and cases cited therein.
  • Galbraith v. Galbraith 396 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
  • Boyett v. Ingram 391 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Ahlers v. Ahlers 384 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
    Bank in Shreveport, , (1962).
  • Austin v. Austin 378 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    “No principle of law has received greater and more frequent sanctions, or is more deeply imbedded in our jurisprudence, than that which forbids a collateral attack on a judgment or order of a competent tribunal, not void on its face ab initio.” , at 868 (1962).
  • Tidwell v. Goston 371 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    2d Cir. 1962), affirmed , (1962); Walters v. Childers, 214 La.
  • Thomason v. Thomason 355 So. 2d 908 La. 1978
  • Frederick v. Steber 346 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Price v. Price 326 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    (1962); Collins v. Zachary Hardwood Lumber Company, Inc., (La.App.
  • Nethken v. Nethken 307 So. 2d 563 La. 1975
    2001-2006; , (1963); In re Phoenix Building & Homestead Assn., 203 La.
  • State ex rel. Guste v. First National Bank of Jefferson Parish 305 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    As the Supreme Court has stated in Allen vs. Commercial National Bank in Shreveport, , : “No principle of law has received greater and more frequent sanction, or is more deeply imbedded in our jurisprudence, than that which forbids a collateral attack on a judgment or order of a competent tribunal, not void on its face ab initio.
  • Carrier v. Travelers Insurance Co. 304 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    The law relative to the validity of a , (1962), where our Supreme Court stated: ( ) “A judgment is the solemn adjudication of a court, established by law, made in a suit upon the relative claims of parties thereto, as disclosed by the record, and which passes on the matters so presented for determination.
  • Reed v. Meaux 292 So. 2d 557 La. 1974
  • Barnett v. Develle 289 So. 2d 129 La. 1974
    338 , ; , ; Collins v. Zachary Hardwood Lumber Co., La.App., ; Himel v. Connely, 195 La.
  • Reed v. Mullin Wood Company, Inc. 274 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    (1963); Anderson v. Legrande, 140 So.
  • Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc. 270 So. 2d 512 La. 1972
    App., , affirmed , ; Daigle v. Pan Am.
  • Cameron State Bank v. Duhon 263 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    2 Cir. 1962; affirmed , ).
  • Houston Oil Field Material Co. v. Pioneer Oil & Gas Co. 236 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    (1962), reviewed some of our jurisprudence: “ * * * A judgment is a fiat of a court settling the rights of the parties, and however unjust, erroneous, or illegal the settlement may be, the parties can only claim under it that which, by its terms, the judgment awards.
  • Roddy v. Independent Oil & Chemical Workers Union of Louisiana 233 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Vincent v. Hunt 221 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
  • Barnes v. Barnes 207 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Collins v. Zachary Hardwood Lumber Co. 207 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    As stated in Allen v. Commercial National Bank in Shreveport (1962), , : “No principle of law has received greater and more frequent sanction, or is more deeply imbedded in our jurisprudence, than that which forbids a collateral attack on a judgment or order of a competent tribunal, not void on its face ab initio.
  • Garnett v. Ancar 203 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    said: "No principle of law has received greater and more frequent sanction, or is more deeply bedded in our jurisprudence, than that which forbids a collateral attack on a judgment or order of a competent tribunal not void on its face ab initio * * *" The question to be decided here is whether the defa
  • Alexander v. Alexander 196 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
  • O'NIELL v. Sonnier 195 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
  • Consolidated Loans, Inc. v. Smith 190 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    that an order for issuance of a writ of seizure and sale is considered a judgment for purposes of appeal, counsel for Consolidated argues that reconvenors' failure to take any action in the executory proceedings constituted a waiver of whatever rights reconvenors possessed and therefore reconvenors a
  • Pioneer Bank & Trust Company v. Foggin 177 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
  • Burnett v. Burnett 170 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    and therein made the following statement: “A judgment is the solemn adjudication of a court, established by law, made in a suit upon the relative claims of parties thereto, as disclosed by the record, and which passes on the matters so presented for determination.