Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Edward Levy Metals, Inc. v. New Orleans Public Belt Railroad, 148 So. 2d 580.

27 citing documents.

Snow v. Weyant 923 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Edward Levy Metals, , (1963).
Reynolds Metals Co. v. Avondale Container Yard Storage & Repair, Inc. 597 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
In Edward Levy Metals, , (1963), the court interpreted this statute as follows: This prescription may be invoked by the carrier or shipper against claims asserted against it and is not available to parties occupying the position of third party defendant here who are not privy to the contract of affreightment, (at
Gilmore v. Reising Sunrise Bakery 531 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Edward Levy Metals, , (1963); Blue Streak Enterprises, Inc. v. Gulf Coast Marine, Inc., (La.App.
Holley v. Singletary 464 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Edward Levy Metals, , (1963).
Trigg v. Camper Village, Inc. 467 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
624 , (1967); Edward Levy Metals, , (1963).
Bison v. LaHood 390 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Edward Levy Metals, , (1963).
Orleans Parish Sch. Bd. v. Pittman Const. Co., Inc. 372 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Edward Levy Metals, , (La.
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Hunt 371 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Blue Streak Enterprises v. Gulf Coast Marine 370 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
See Edward Levy Metals, , at 583 (1963).
Thomas v. W & W CLARKLIFT, INC. 365 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Peloquin v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury 367 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Edward Levy Metals, , (1963); Importsales v. Lindeman, 231 La.
Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Fiberglass Insulators, Inc. 367 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Belt R., , (1963), the Court held that prescription against an action for indemnification does not begin to run until the party to whom it is due is cast in judgment.
Deshotels v. Statewide Trailer Sales 333 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Edward Levy Metals, Rosenthral v. Baer, 18 La.Ann.
Orleans Parish School Board v. Williams 312 So. 2d 647 La. 1975
Lincecum v. Smith 287 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Edward Levy Metals, , (1963); Rosenthral v. Baer, 18 La.
Travelers Insurance Company v. Veal 280 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Travelers cites the following authorities for the proposition that the right of indemnification is quasi contractual in nature and subject to the ten-year liberative prescriptive period: Edward Levy Metals, , (1963); Plummer v. Motors Insurance Company, 233 La.
Philip R. Farnsworth & Co. v. State, Department of Highways 277 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
See, Edward Levy Metals, , 148 So.
LeBlanc v. Big Jim's, Inc. 252 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
In Lewis, supra, the Court of Appeal stated that in cases of this character the nature of plaintiff’s demand governs the applicable rule of prescription, and that the character of the demand is to be determined by the allegations of the third party petition, citing as authority for this proposition Edward Levy Metals, , .
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Cities Service Oil Co. 251 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
539 (1922); Edward Levy Metals, , (1963); and Minyard v. Curtis Products, Inc., 251 La.
Minyard v. Curtis Products, Inc. 205 So. 2d 422 La. 1967
In Edward Levy Metals, , (1963) the Court again reaffirmed the classification of a claim for indemnity as an action in quasi contract.
Victory Oil Company v. Perret 183 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
Belt R. R., , (1963); Johnson v. Kennedy, 235 La.
Wooten v. Central Mutual Insurance Company 166 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
See also Edward Levy Metals, , .)
Davis v. American Marine Corp. 163 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
2d 80 (La.Court of Appeal, 4th Cir. 1962, reversed on other grounds, , ).
Lewis v. Republic Supply Co. 155 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Belt R., , , appellant maintains the trial court erred in sustaining appellees' pleas of one year prescription because the third party demand asserted herein is in effect an action for indemnity consequently prescription does not run on such a demand until at least one year from the date liability of the party se
Sharp v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc. 153 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Belt R., , , the Supreme Court made the following observation in reference to prescription applicable to one seeking indemnification: “In Marquette Casualty Co. v. Brown, 235 La.
Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Boudoin 154 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Continental Casualty Co. v. Ramon 151 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Belt R., La., ; Port Finance Co. v. Ber, La.App., ; Broussard v. Friedman, La.App., ; Aarnes v. Kaplan & Son, 7 La.App.