DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Manuel v. Broderson, 298 So. 2d 333.

21 citing documents.

  • Kuykendall v. Circle, Inc. 539 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • Lucas v. Deville 526 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • Micelli v. Moore 499 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Langley v. Langley 497 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    3d Cir.1975); writ denied, (La.App.
  • Baker v. Baker 480 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Blake v. Blake 478 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Sanchez v. Sanchez 460 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • Sims v. Sims 457 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • Clooney v. Clooney 446 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    App. 3rd Cir.1975) (La.App.
  • Plauche v. Plauche 444 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • Courville v. Courville 401 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
  • Wasson v. Wasson 402 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    3d Cir. 1975), writ denied, ; (La.App.
  • Franks v. Mercer 401 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
  • Moore v. Moore 380 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
  • Dubois v. Breaux 341 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
  • Nelson v. Nelson 335 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    ( , La.App.)" The appellant contends the main issue is the "needs" of the child, and that the trial judge disregarded "the law relative to burden of proof" in fixing the amount of child support.
  • Dupre v. Pelotto 336 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    In support of this position Appellee cites and relies upon Kennedy v. Kennedy, La.App., and Manuel v. Broderson, La.App., .
  • CAPITAL BLDG. AND LOAN ASS'N v. Nicholas 330 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
  • Broussard v. Menard 316 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    Later cases applying the Thornton rule to alimony and child support are: (La.
  • Morrison v. Morrison 316 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    The appellant argues that the trial judge's decision to maintain the child support payments at $150.00 (La.App.
  • Fall v. Fontenot 307 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    The trial court calculated the amount of child support by finding that defendant is earning about $900 (La.App.