Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Horns v. Brown, 148 So. 2d 607.
- Fruchtzweig v. Southern Specialty Sales Company 161 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
- Neely v. Brown 161 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
-
Kimble v. Brown
162 So. 2d 415
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
The word “misconduct” has frequently been defined in our jurisprudence, , (1963).
-
Persley v. Brown
160 So. 2d 437
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Neither do we think there can be any question as to the fact that the record in the instant case supports the conclusion that the plaintiff was guilty of misconduct under the definition, inter alia, , .
-
Dameron-Pierson Co. v. Bryant
157 So. 2d 886
La. 1963
See, Gatlin v. Brown, La.App., ; Beaird-Poulan, Inc. v. Brady, La.App., ; ; , ; ; Burge v. Administrator, Etc., La.App., ; 41 A.L.R.2d 1155 ; 81 C.J.S.
- January v. Administrator, Division of Employ. SEC. 155 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
-
Beaird-Poulan, Inc. v. Brady
154 So. 2d 589
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
609: "`Misconduct within the meaning of an unemployment compensation act excluding from its benefits an employee discharged for misconduct must be an act of wanton or wilful disregard of the employer's interest, a deliberate violation of the employer's rules, a disregard of standards of behavior whic
-
Gatlin v. Brown
154 So. 2d 224
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
48 Am.Jur., p. 541, verbo "Social Security, Unemployment Insurance, and Retirement Funds," § 38; , .