Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Green, 150 So. 2d 571.

47 citing documents.

  • State v. Palmer 448 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Palmer 447 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    (1963), (overruled on other grounds)
  • State v. Simms 381 So. 2d 472 La. 1980
    (1963), (overruled on other grounds)
  • State v. Jones 358 So. 2d 1257 La. 1978
    950 , (1966); , (1963); State v. Aias, 243 La.
  • State v. Linkletter 345 So. 2d 452 La. 1977
    329 , 3 L.Ed.2d 327 (1959); , (1963); State v. Aias, 243 La.
  • State v. Prater 337 So. 2d 1107 La. 1976
  • State v. Liesk 326 So. 2d 871 La. 1976
    765 , (1967); , (1963); State v. Morris, 222 La.
  • State v. Babin 319 So. 2d 367 La. 1975
    765 , (1967); , (1963); State v. Morris, 222 La.
  • State v. Stetson 317 So. 2d 172 La. 1975
    306 , (1969); , (1963); State v. Bellam, 225 La.
  • State v. Traylor 311 So. 2d 847 La. 1975
    (1963), this Court faced a related issue.
  • State v. George 312 So. 2d 860 La. 1975
    765 , (1967); , (1963); State v. Morris, 222 La.
  • State v. Murphy 309 So. 2d 134 La. 1975
  • State v. Lewis 296 So. 2d 824 La. 1974
    765 , (1967) instruction to the jury; , (1963) instruction to the jury; State v. Morris, 222 La.
  • State v. Blackwell 298 So. 2d 798 La. 1974
  • State v. Davis 289 So. 2d 123 La. 1974
    329 , 3 L.Ed.2d 327 (1959); , (1963); State v. Aias, 243 La.
  • State v. Warren 283 So. 2d 740 La. 1973
    329 , 3 L.Ed.2d 327 (1959); , (1963); State v. Aias, 243 La.
  • State v. Taylor 282 So. 2d 491 La. 1973
    1199 , 22 L.Ed.2d 460 ; , (1963).
  • State v. Holloway 274 So. 2d 699 La. 1973
  • State v. Edgecombe 275 So. 2d 740 La. 1973
  • State v. Sheppard 268 So. 2d 590 La. 1972
  • State v. Bell 268 So. 2d 610 La. 1972
  • State v. Franklin 268 So. 2d 249 La. 1972
    15:432 (presumption that public -officers have done their duty); , (1963).
  • State v. Polk 247 So. 2d 853 La. 1971
  • State v. Harris 247 So. 2d 847 La. 1971
  • State v. Banks 246 So. 2d 191 La. 1971
    765 , (1967) ; , (1960).
  • State v. Grey 245 So. 2d 178 La. 1971
    State v. Simpson, 247 La.
  • State v. Simpson 249 So. 2d 536 La. 1971
    (1963) ; and State v. Andrus, 250 La.
  • State v. Favre 232 So. 2d 479 La. 1970
  • State v. White 223 So. 2d 843 La. 1969
  • State v. Vale 215 So. 2d 811 La. 1968
    135; See also, , , State v. Aias, 243 La.
  • State v. Pebworth 208 So. 2d 530 La. 1968
  • State v. Brown 202 So. 2d 274 La. 1967
    See, also, , ; State v. Aias, 243 La.
  • State v. Jones 201 So. 2d 105 La. 1967
  • State v. Hopper 203 So. 2d 222 La. 1967
  • State v. Andrus 199 So. 2d 867 La. 1967
  • State v. Ahrens 196 So. 2d 250 La. 1967
    329 , 3 L.Ed.2d 327 (1959); , (1963); State v. Aias, 243 La.
  • State v. Williams 193 So. 2d 787 La. 1967
    See, e. g., , ; State v. Calascione, 243 La.
  • State v. Johnson 192 So. 2d 135 La. 1966
    329 , 3 L.Ed.2d 327 (1959); , (1963); State v. Aias, 243 La.
  • State v. Simien 178 So. 2d 266 La. 1965
    and numerous authorities there cited.
  • State v. Simpson 175 So. 2d 255 La. 1965
  • State v. Simpson 175 So. 2d 255 La. 1965
  • State v. Oliver 174 So. 2d 509 La. 1965
    And, albeit it is proper on the voir dire examination of a juror for counsel to inquire whether he is willing to accept the law as instructed by the court ( , ), the judge exercises a sound discretion in restricting the breadth of the examination to this inquiry, so that counsel may not unduly explore every detail of the mental attitude of the juror in order to commit him in advance as to his reactions to evidence or the lack of it or as to his application o
  • State v. Marchetti 173 So. 2d 531 La. 1965
    We find that under Louisiana law, which controls in determining the validity of the arrest, , , Ker v. State of California, 374 U.S. 23 , 83 S.Ct.
  • State v. Oliver 174 So. 2d 509 La. 1965
    And, albeit it is proper on the voir dire examination of a juror for counsel to inquire whether he is willing to accept the law as instructed by the court ( , ), the judge exercises a sound discretion in restricting the *514 breadth of the examination to this inquiry, so that counsel may not unduly explore every detail of the mental attitude of the juror in order to commit him in advance as to his reactions to evidence or the lack of it or as to his applicat
  • State v. McIlvaine 174 So. 2d 515 La. 1965
    (1963); State v. Aias, 243 La.
  • State v. Marchetti 173 So. 2d 531 La. 1965
    We find that under Louisiana law, which controls in determining the validity of the arrest, , , Ker v. State of California, 374 U.S. 23 , 83 S.Ct.
  • State v. James 169 So. 2d 89 La. 1964
    (1963) ; State v. Calascione, 243 La.