Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Phelps v. Donaldson, 150 So. 2d 35.
-
State Of Louisiana, Et Al. v. Louisiana Land &
La. 2022
App. 3 Cir. 1991) (cause of action began to prescribe when “plaintiff consulted with her attorney for consideration of a possible malpractice claim”); Phelps v. Donaldson , 150 So.
-
State Of Louisiana, Et Al. v. Louisiana Land &
La. 2021
App. 3 Cir. 1991) (cause of action began to prescribe when “plaintiff consulted with her attorney for consideration of a possible malpractice claim”); 150 So.
-
Upscale Fashions, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London
254 So. 3d 784
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1993) (citing Phelps v. Donaldson , , , 37 (1963) ).
-
Branch v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center
636 So. 2d 211
La. 1994
(1963) (interpreting La.Civ.Code art. 3544 (1870)).
- Roger v. Dufrene 613 So. 2d 947 La. 1993
- Roger v. Dufrene 602 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
593 So. 2d 351
La. 1992
Co., , (1963); Cherokee Restaurant, (La.App.
-
Clofer v. Celotex Corp.
528 So. 2d 1074
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Orgeron, supra, at 369 .
- Seals v. Pittman 499 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
Elzy v. ABC Ins. Co.
472 So. 2d 205
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
NOTES [1] , (1963), occasionally cited for such a holding, did not consider the question because damages for breach of a contract for ordinary dental care were not there demanded.
-
Martin v. Southern Baptist Hosp. of New Orleans
444 So. 2d 1309
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
[1] , (1963) the court held that an action for medical malpractice prescribes in one year unless there is a specific contract to cure.
-
Wingate v. National Union Fire Ins. Co.
435 So. 2d 594
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
"We hold that the better view is the one adopted in Phelps v. Donaldson, [ , ], and we continue to ascribe to that view.
- Dillon v. Hospital Affiliates of Baton Rouge 407 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-
Cummings v. Skeahan Corp.
405 So. 2d 1146
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
In seeking an affirmance of the trial court's judgment, Parker argues that a malpractice action against an attorney prescribes one year from the date the professional work is performed or one year from the date plaintiff becomes aware of the action complained of and cites two cases supporting this argument, , (1963) and Steel v. Aetna Life & Casualty, (La.App.
-
Sciacca v. Polizzi
403 So. 2d 728
La. 1981
(1963), as had the Fifth Circuit in Kozan , and reached the same result.
- Free v. Franklin Guest Home, Inc. 397 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
- Sciacca v. Polizzi 394 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Sumerall v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 366 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
-
Henson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
363 So. 2d 711
La. 1978
La.Civil Code art. 3536; , (1963); Steel v. Aetna Life & Casualty, writ denied, (La.
-
Carroll v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
363 So. 2d 726
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
(1963), after finding that the physician had not contracted with plaintiffs to warrant a particular result.
-
Henson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
354 So. 2d 612
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
(1963) to sustain its position.
-
Lombardo v. Argonaut Ins. Co.
354 So. 2d 731
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
In turn, appellee contends that an operation without the consent of the patient sounds in tort, , and Steel v. Aetna Life & Casualty Company, (La.App.
-
Ball v. Siess
351 So. 2d 845
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
(1963), the Supreme Court recognized as a general rule that a physician who undertakes the treatment of a patient does not guarantee a cure, nor does he promise to effect a cure, nor does his undertaking employment result in any implied promise to cure.
- Chatellier v. Ochsner Foundation Hospital 348 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- Perrin v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 340 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
-
Dauzat v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
336 So. 2d 540
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
(1963), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "When a physician undertakes the treatment of a case, he does not guarantee a cure, nor is any promise to effect a cure or even a partial healing to be implied, nor does the law raise from the fact of employment an implied undertaking to use ordinary skill and
-
Duhon v. Saloom
323 So. 2d 202
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
(1963) the Supreme Court ruled that the one-year prescription of Civil Code Article 3536 applied to a malpractice suit.
-
Steel v. Aetna Life and Casualty
315 So. 2d 144
La. 1975
has been properly applied in this case, and if so, whether it is correct.
- Bell v. Faris 304 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
- Steel v. Aetna Life & Casualty 304 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
-
Brock v. Gunter
292 So. 2d 328
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
(1963), the Supreme Court emphasized this rule in commenting thusly: "We think the general rule universally obtaining on the subject matter is that: `When a physician undertakes the treatment of a case he does not guarantee a cure, nor is any promise to effect a cure or even a partial healing to be impl
-
Fox v. Argonaut Southwest Insurance Company
288 So. 2d 102
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
* * *" , (1963), physicians, surgeons and dentists are not insurers of the results of treatment afforded patients.
-
Alexander v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation
276 So. 2d 794
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
With respect to plaintiff's position that the defendants committed a breach of contract, , : "We think the general rule universally obtaining on the subject matter is that: `When a physician undertakes the treatment of a case he does not guarantee a cure, nor is any promise to effect a cure or even a partial healing to be implied, nor does the law raise from the fact of employment an implied
- Deshotel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 269 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
-
Box v. Karam
271 So. 2d 289
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
the Supreme Court held that malpractice actions are'tortious m nature and prescribe in one year.
-
Butler v. Travelers Insurance Co.
264 So. 2d 756
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(1963): "We think the general rule universally obtaining on the subject matter is that: `When a physician undertakes the treatment, of a case he does not guarantee a cure, nor is any promise to effect a cure or even a partial healing to be implied, nor does the law raise from the fact of employment an i
-
Creighton v. Karlin
225 So. 2d 288
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
We find only two cases in the jurisprudence of Louisiana wherein attempts have been made to bring an action for damages in contract in situations similar to that presented here: , (1963); (La.App.
-
Foster v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co.
212 So. 2d 729
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
(1963), physicians, surgeons, and dentists are not insurers of the results of treatment afforded patients."
-
Folse v. Anderson
202 So. 2d 404
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
“ , : ‘We think the general rule universally obtaining on the subject matter is that: ‘When a physician undertakes the treatment of a case he does not guarantee a cure, nor is any promise to effect a cure or even a partial healing to be implied, nor does the law raise from the fact of employment an implied
-
Stern v. Boyce
200 So. 2d 318
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
: “We think the general rule universally obtaining on the subject matter is that: ‘When a physician undertakes the treatment of a case he does not guarantee a cure, nor is any promise to effect a cure or even a partial healing to be implied, nor does the law raise from the fact of employment an implied
- Uter v. Bone and Joint Clinic 192 So. 2d 100 La. 1966
-
Brooks v. Robinson
163 So. 2d 186
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Action which constitutes a breach of contract may, at the same time, also constitute a tort; and an action in tort to recover the damages caused (regardless of the contractual aspects of the facts) is prescribed by one year; , (1963).
-
Devillier v. First National Funeral Homes, Inc.
164 So. 2d 597
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
(3rd Cir.), (Affirmed, , ).