Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Naquin v. Marquette Casualty Company, 153 So. 2d 395.

133 citing documents.

Bunkie Funeral Home, Inc. v. McNutt 414 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Blue Ridge Insurance v. Belle Alliance Homes, Inc. 408 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
The court further stated if the circumstantial proof excludes other reasonable hypotheses with a fair amount of certainty, so that it is more probable than not that the harm was caused by the tortious conduct of the defendant, then plaintiff should recover, , (1963), rehearing denied 1963.
Joseph v. Albarado 407 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
(1963), the court said 153 So.2d at 397 : "Causation may, of course, be proved by circumstantial evidence.
Kalmn, Inc. v. Empiregas Corp. 406 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Boswell v. John Deere Co. 405 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Cormier v. Foremost Ins. Co. 405 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Company, supra; , (1963).
DeBattista v. Argonaut-Southwest Ins. Co. 403 So. 2d 26 La. 1981
Swanson v. Estate of Augusta 403 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Company, supra ; , (1963).
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Saunders 394 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Whatever the descriptive term used, however, proof by direct or circumstantial evidence is sufficient to constitute a preponderance, when, taking the evidence as a whole, such proof shows that the fact or causation sought to be proved is more probable than not.’ Further, , (1963), by this burden of proof, the circumstantial evidence requisite in civil negligence cases need not negate all other possible causes of injury, as the opinions of the previous courts seemed to hold.
Johnson v. Harry Jarred, Inc. 391 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
559: "The general tort principle obviously applicable to this case is that `those who use or handle dangerous agencies, substances or instrumentalities such as explosives, electricity, firearms, combustibles and *904 fireworks, which might endanger persons or property, are held to a high degree or extraordinary degree of care.'" , (1963), the court made the following statement regarding natural gas: "In Raphael Brothers v. Cerophyl Laboratories, 211 La.
Maryland Cas. Co. v. Trahan 384 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
[2] , ; Fogleman v. Piggly Wiggly Operators Warehouse, Inc., La.App., ; A & M Pest Control Serv.
South Central Bell Tel. Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indemnity Co. 385 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Western Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Adams 381 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 370 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Lachney v. Motor Parts & Bearing Supply 357 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Wallace v. Pan American Fire & Cas. Co. 352 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
(1963); Harris Drilling Co. v. Delafield, 222 La.
Dussouy v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 346 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
995 , (1971), the Louisiana Supreme Court, in considering the test of sufficiency of evidence in a circumstantial evidence case, , (1963), said: “ * * * Whatever the descriptive term used, however, proof by direct or circumstantial evidence 'is sufficient to constitute a preponderance, when, taking the evidence as a whole, such proof shows that the fact or causation sought to be proved is more probable than not.” See also A &amp
Ledet v. Hibernia National Bank of New Orleans 344 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Williams v. Morris 343 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
137 , ; , ; Perkins v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company, 243 La.
A & M Pest Control Serv., Inc. v. FEJTA CONST. CO. INC. 338 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
The test of sufficiency in a , (1963).
Motors Insurance Corporation v. Melder 336 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Culpepper v. Natchitoches Parish School Bd. 333 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Campbell v. Diamond M. Drilling Company, Inc., (3rd Cir.La.App.
Reggio v. Louisiana Gas Service Co. 333 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
(1936), confronted with a gas explosion case, held that the failure of employees of a municipal gas distribution system to discover a dime-size leak in a corroded underground service pipe constituted negligence where the municipal inspection system was inadequate.
Reese v. South Coast Corp. 328 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
(1963); Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, (1973).
Casadaban v. Bel Chemical & Supply Co., Inc. 322 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
(1963), the Court stated the following: "Taken as a whole, circumstantial evidence must exclude other reasonable hypotheses with a fair amount of certainty.
Townsend v. State, Department of Highways 322 So. 2d 139 La. 1975
1973); Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Company, supra ; , (1963).
Llewellyn v. Lookout Saddle Company 315 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
Weber v. Fidelity &, Casualty Insurance Company of New York, supra; , (1963).
Braud v. Kinchen 310 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
137 , (1964); , (1963); American Employers Ins.
Braud v. Kinchen 310 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
137 , (1964); , (1963); American Employers Ins.
Federal Insurance Company v. Cinnater 305 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
3 Cir. 1966); , (1963)."
Chaplain v. Kinsella 302 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
LeBlanc v. Travelers Insurance Company 291 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
137 , ; , ; Perkins v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company, 243 La.
Clark v. Central Louisiana Electric Co., Inc. 284 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 284 So. 2d 905 La. 1973
Thomas v. Chatman 282 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
(1963), which held that circumstantial evidence required in civil negligence cases need not negate all other possible causes of injury.
Vonner v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF PUBLIC WELFARE 273 So. 2d 252 La. 1973
Co., , (1963), it need only prove the causal relationship to be more probable than not, Weber v. Fidelity & Cas.
Jennings v. Allstate Insurance Company 273 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
70 (1941); , (1963); Perkins v. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Company, 243 La.
Boudreaux v. American Insurance Company 264 So. 2d 621 La. 1972
Whatever the descriptive term used, however, proof by direct or circumstantial evidence is sufficient to constitute a preponderance, when, taking the evidence as a whole, such proof shows that the fact or causation sought to be proved is more probable than not.” Further, , (1963), by this burden of proof, the circumstantial evidence requisite in civil negligence cases need not negate all other possible causes of injury, as the present opinion of the court holds.
Murphy v. Central Louisiana Electric Co. 261 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Leake v. Prudhomme Truck Tank Service, Inc. 258 So. 2d 358 La. 1972
625 , (1964); , (1963); Harris Drilling Co. v. Delafield, 222 La.
Royal Insurance Co. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 256 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
the Supreme Court held that proof in the chain of causation may be supplied by circumstantial evidence provided all hypothesis to the contrary are eliminated to a fair degree of certainty.
Romero v. Butcher Air Conditioning Company 255 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
Parkin v. Industrial Armature, Inc. 252 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
our Supreme Court stated: “In the recent case of Perkins v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company, 243 La.
Ferina v. United Paper Co. 252 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
(1963); Perkins v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company, 243 La.
Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of NY 250 So. 2d 754 La. 1971
Miller Car Washes, Inc. v. Crowe 245 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
(1963); Harris Drilling Co. v. Delafield, 222 La.
Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Company 245 So. 2d 151 La. 1971
137 , (1964); , (1963); Perkins v. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Co., 243 La.
Bryant v. Slidell Memorial Hospital 243 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
137 , (1964) ; , (1963); Perkins v. Texas & New Orleans Railway Co., 243 La.
Mogabgab v. Orleans Parish School Board 239 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
(1963), and Sanders, Anatomy of Proof in Civil Actions, 28 La.L.Rev.
Hutchins v. Westley 235 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
137 , ; , ; Perkins v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company, 243 La.