Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Walmsley v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation, 153 So. 2d 375.

14 citing documents.

  • Heirs of John Beckwith LLC, Price Heirs LLC, James M. Foster Trust, Linda Price Ellzey, John v. Price, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
    App. 4 Cir. 1978)(“the Walmsley [v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation, So.2d 375 (1963)] case along with all of the Supreme Court cases .
  • Spencer v. James 955 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Corp., , (1963); (La.App.
  • Parker v. MacHen 567 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    Corp., , (1963); (La.App.
  • Ponder v. Jenkins 468 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Criticized Todd v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources 474 So. 2d 430 La. 1985
    (1963), relied on introductory remarks before Title II, Real Actions, to conclude that the action was still viable, the decision has been much criticized.
  • Papworth v. Truxton Corp. 357 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    In holding that plaintiffs had properly brought an action to remove clouds from their title the court, with expressed reluctance, , (1963).
  • Criticized Harrison v. Alombro 341 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    (1963), holding to the contrary, is still the law.
  • Criticized Bordelon v. Haas Investment Co. 337 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    (1963), our Supreme Court held that this action survived enactment of the Code of Civil Procedure in 1960.
  • Criticized Verret v. Norwood 313 So. 2d 842 La. 1975
  • Verret v. Norwood 311 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    (1963), it was held that the action survived passage of the Code of Civil Procedure.
  • Union Bank v. Roy 182 So. 2d 319 La. 1965
  • Giuffria Realty Company v. Kathman-Landry, Inc. 173 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
    (1963), has broadened the action to remove a cloud from title to allow it to utilize it in this situation.
  • Shell v. Greer 171 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    rtain of the fringe actions which bear some resemblance to the real actions, such as the action of trespass, the action to remove a cloud from title, and the action of specific performance.” If there be any doubt that our Courts would continue to recognize the validity of the action to remove cloud from title, , (1963), a case decided by the Supreme Court subsequent to the adoption of the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure.
  • St. Mary Parish Land Company v. State Mineral Bd. 167 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    On appeal the defendant re-urges its exception that the State of Louisiana is an indispensable party, relying principally on an attempt to distinguish the case of Walmsley v. Pan American Petroleum, et *512 al., , from the situation at bar.