Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lumber Products, Inc. v. Crochet, 156 So. 2d 438.

15 citing documents.

Bayou Pierre Farms v. Bat Farms Partners 693 So. 2d 1158 La. 1997
art. 3185; Lumber Products
Slagle-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Landis Const. Co. 379 So. 2d 479 La. 1980
art. 3185; Lumber Products, , (1933).
Paul E. Riviere, Inc. v. Universal Excavators, Inc. 358 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Lumber Products, , .” (La.App.
Federal Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Calsim, Inc. 340 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
[8] Lumber Products, , ; Shreveport Long Leaf Lumber Co. v. Wilson, 195 La.
Subdivision Planning Engineers, Inc. v. Manor Development Corp. 337 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Lumber Products, So.2d 438 ; Courshon v. Mauroner-Craddock, Inc., La.App., .
Alside Supply Company v. Gervais 303 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
* * *" In Lumber Products, , (1963), our Supreme Court, after reviewing the jurisprudence *588 concerning the privilege granted by LSA-R.S.
REFRACTORY CONST., INC. v. Cities Service Oil Co. 278 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
705 , (1969); and Lumber Products, , (1963).
Pringle Associated Mortgage Corporation v. Eanes 208 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
City National Bank v. Sunshine Processing Co. 209 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
9:4812) must not only institute suit before the expiration of one year from the recordation of the privilege, but must also reinscribe its lien and privilege annually until the suit is terminated, citing Lumber Products, , ; Shreveport Long Leaf Lumber Co. v. Wilson, 195 La.
McGee v. Missouri Valley Dredging Co. 182 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
App., ; Hughes v. Will (1948) La.App., ; Clarke v. Shaffett (1948) La.App., ; Graeme Spring & Brake Service, Inc. v. De Felice (1957) La.App., ; Lumber Products, Inc. v. Crochet (1963) , ; Kaplan v. Pettigrew (1963) La.App., .
Cormier v. Pitre 182 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
The trial judge, relying largely on Lumber Products, , , and Abry Brothers, Inc. v. Tillman, 245 La.
Pennington v. Campanella 180 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
App.1957) ; Lumber Products, Inc. v. Crochet (1963) , ; Kaplan v. Pettigrew (La.App.
Motels of Terrebonne, Inc. v. Baton Rouge Engineering Co. 173 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
* * * ” We believe the ruling in Lumber Products, Inc. v. Crochet, (1963) , , to be apropos to the issue involved here.
Pate v. Gisclair 162 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
In Lumber Products, , , the Supreme Court made crystal clear that to preserve the effect of the registry of the lien against the property, it was essential same be reinscribed within one year from the date of the recordation, holding: “ * * * The object of the rein-scription of the privilege would be to preserve its effects
Abry Bros., Inc. v. Tillman 162 So. 2d 346 La. 1964
Undoubtedly, under the holding of this court in Lumber Products, , , the prescription of one year pleaded against the in rem action is meritorious.